Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Comments closed.

Due to the sensitive and/or legal subject matter of some of the content on globalnews.ca, we reserve the ability to disable comments from time to time.

Please see our Commenting Policy for more.

Evidence ‘overwhelmingly’ proved murder, Crown tells Andrew Berry appeal hearing

Andrew Berry, convicted of second-degree murder of his two daughters on Christmas Day 2017, is appealing his case. Defence argues things admitted in his first trial should not have been, and there were procedural errors in the trial, including a charge to the jury. Crown argues that there is nothing to mitigate the overwhelming evidence of guilt. Kristen Robinson reports. – Jun 23, 2022

The fate of an Oak Bay, B.C., man convicted of murdering his two young daughters now sits in the hands of a three-judge panel.

Story continues below advertisement

Arguments in an appeal hearing for Andrew Berry wrapped at the B.C. Supreme Court in Vancouver on Thursday, with the judges reserving their decision until an unknown date.

A jury found Berry guilty on two counts of second-degree murder for fatally stabbing four-year-old Aubrey and six-year-old Chloe Berry to death in his apartment on Christmas Day 2017.

Berry’s trial heard that he had said “leave me alone” and “kill me” when found with suspected self-inflected stab wounds in his bathtub.

Throughout hearings this week, Berry’s lawyer Tim Russell has raised several alleged deficiencies in his client’s trial, including the claim the trial judge erred in how she instructed the jury on how it should weight a potential manslaughter conviction.

Russell had argued that there was evidence of motive for Berry to attempt suicide but that there was no motive for him to kill the girls.

Story continues below advertisement

On the final day of hearings, Crown lawyer Christie Lusk told justices John Hunter, Patrice Abiroux and Joyce DeWitt-Van Oosten the judge’s instructions to the jury were not grounds for a new trial.

Lusk argued the trial judge made no error, and adequately equipped jurors to consider Berry’s state of mind at the time of the crime.

“Physical evidence overwhelmingly established guilt for murder,” she told the court, adding, “there was no air of reality to manslaughter” and that, “the jury would have inevitably found intent.”

Story continues below advertisement

Evidence that each of the girls was stabbed more than two dozen times in their beds and that neither had defensive wounds was undisputed, Crown argued.

The only DNA found at the scene belonged to Berry and the girls.

“If there was an error of law, whole of evidence shows defendant’s guilt,” Lusk argued.

Earlier in the four-day hearing, the two sides had sparred over whether statements Berry made to firefighters, paramedics and health-care workers should have been accepted at trial and whether he had correctly been informed of his right to silence.

Story continues below advertisement

Berry is currently serving a life sentence with no chance of parole for 22 years.

At trial, prosecutors had argued he killed the girls after hitting rock bottom over a gambling addiction that left him unable to pay his bills, and fear of losing custody of the girls to his ex-partner.

The jury rejected defence’s argument that the girls had actually been killed by someone working for a loan shark to whom Berry owed a large sum.

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article