Biden says Supreme Court seat should not be filled until after election

Click to play video: 'Joe Biden calls on government to honour Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s ‘dying wish’'
Joe Biden calls on government to honour Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s ‘dying wish’
WATCH ABOVE: Joe Biden calls on government to honour Ruth Bader Ginsburg’s ‘dying wish’ – Sep 20, 2020

U.S. Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden said the government should honour the dying wish of Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and not fill her vacant seat until after the election scheduled for Nov. 3.

Biden’s comments came during a speech in Philadelphia on Sunday.
“Voters of this country should be heard … they’re the ones who this Constitution envisions should decide who has the power to make this appointment,” he said. “To jam this nomination through the Senate is just an exercise of raw political power.”
The former vice president called upon Senate Republicans to do “what is right” when seeking to replace Bader Ginsburg.
Story continues below advertisement

“Please follow your conscience,” he said.

Trump on Saturday said he will make his nomination this week and named Amy Coney Barrett of the Chicago-based 7th Circuit and Barbara Lagoa of the Atlanta-based 11th Circuit as possible candidates to fill the vacancy created by Friday’s death of liberal icon Bader Ginsburg.

The passing of Bader Ginsburg upended the November election contests, energizing both Trump’s conservative base – eager to see the court overturn the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision that legalized abortion nationwide – and presenting new complications in the battle for control of the U.S. Senate.

“I will be putting forth a nominee next week. It will be a woman,” Trump said at a campaign rally in Fayetteville, North Carolina, where supporters chanted “fill that seat.” “I think it should be a woman because I actually like women much more than men.”

Click to play video: 'White House press secretary says Trump not ready to name Ruth Bader Ginsburg successor'
White House press secretary says Trump not ready to name Ruth Bader Ginsburg successor


Story continues below advertisement

Trump needs Senate approval for any pick, but his fellow Republicans hold a 53-47 majority and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell has made confirming judges a top priority.

Breaking news from Canada and around the world sent to your email, as it happens.

Democrats are still seething over the Republican-controlled Senate’s refusal in 2016 to act on Democratic President Barack Obama’s Supreme Court nominee, Merrick Garland, to replace conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, who died 10 months before that election.

At the time, McConnell said the Senate should not act on a nominee during an election year, but he and other top Republican senators have since reversed that stance.

They have time: While elections are on Nov. 3, a new Congress won’t be sworn in until Jan. 3, with the winner of the presidential contest sworn in on Jan. 20.

‘Lust for power’

Republican Senator John Barrasso on NBC’s “Meet the Press” on Sunday brushed off Democratic complaints about the nomination process.

“Let’s be very clear – if the shoe were on the other foot and the Democrats had the White House and the Senate, they would right now be trying to confirm another member of the Supreme Court,” Barrasso said.

Story continues below advertisement

Democrat Hillary Clinton, whom Trump defeated in the 2016 election, on the same program called that view “indefensible.”

“What’s happening in our country is incredibly dangerous,” said Clinton, a former secretary of state whose husband, Bill Clinton, nominated Bader Ginsburg to the court in 1993. “Our institutions are being basically undermined by the lust for power.”

Click to play video: 'Nancy Pelosi leaves flowers at memorial for Ruth Bader Ginsburg'
Nancy Pelosi leaves flowers at memorial for Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Embattled Republican Senator Susan Collins of Maine on Saturday said the Senate should hold off on voting on a nominee, saying she believed the winner of the presidential election should have the chance to nominate Bader Ginsburg’s successor.

That made her the most notable member of her party to break with McConnell. Senator Lisa Murkowski in an interview with media in her home state of Alaska hours before Bader Ginsburg’s death was reported also said she believed it was too late in an election cycle to confirm a new justice; since Bader Ginsburg’s death she has not spoken publicly.

Story continues below advertisement
Click to play video: 'Remembering U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg'
Remembering U.S. Supreme Court Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Trump has already appointed two justices: Neil Gorsuch in 2017 and Brett Kavanaugh in 2018. Kavanaugh was narrowly confirmed after a heated confirmation process in which he angrily denied accusations by a California university professor, Christine Blasey Ford, that he had sexually assaulted her in 1982 when the two were high school students in Maryland.

‘Nothing is off the table’

Republicans risk the possibility of liberals embracing more radical proposals should Trump replace Bader Ginsburg but Democrats win November’s election, with some activists on the left suggesting even before Bader Ginsburg’s death that the number of justices on the court should be expanded to counter Trump’s appointees.

“Let me be clear: if Leader McConnell and Senate Republicans move forward with this, then nothing is off the table for next year,” Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer told fellow Democrats on a Saturday conference call, according to a source who listened to the call.

Story continues below advertisement

House of Representatives Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerrold Nadler on Saturday said that rushing a court pick through the Senate if Democrats win in November would be “undemocratic.”

-With files from Global News

Sponsored content