Congress to vote on resolution to limit Trump’s military action in Iran

WATCH: Trump on Solemani and Iran

The U.S. House of Representatives will vote Thursday on a measure limiting U.S. President Donald Trump‘s ability to take military action against Iran as Democratic criticism of the U.S. killing of a top Iranian general intensified.

Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., announced the planned vote in a one-page statement that said last week’s drone strike that killed Gen. Qassem Soleimani was “provocative and disproportionate.”

The Democratic war powers resolution seems certain to pass over solid Republican opposition. A similar proposal by Sen. Tim Kaine, D-Va., faces an uphill fight in the GOP-run Senate.

READ MORE: Explained: the powers U.S. presidents have to declare military action

Read next: Boy picks shipping container for hide-and-seek, ends up 2,500 km from home

Because of a procedural dispute between the two parties, it was unclear whether Thursday’s vote would be a step toward binding Trump’s hands on Iran or a symbolic gesture of opposition by Democrats.

Story continues below advertisement

Republicans say the proposal — a special type of resolution that does not get the president’s signature — does not have the force of law. Democrats say that under the 1973 War Powers Act, it would be binding if also approved by the Senate. The matter has not been definitively decided by federal courts.

Click to play video: 'Lindsey Graham says Trump is feeling ‘upbeat’ about Iran situation'
Lindsey Graham says Trump is feeling ‘upbeat’ about Iran situation

The House vote was scheduled shortly after a briefing on Iran Wednesday by top administration officials that many Democrats criticized as lacking specific justification for the killing. Iran retaliated early Wednesday local time by launching missiles at two military bases in Iraq that house American troops. No casualties were reported.

READ MORE: Iran won’t give up black box from Tehran plane crash. Here’s what you need to know

Read next: Scientist says most Bigfoot sightings boil down to this simple explanation

“Members of Congress have serious, urgent concerns about the Administration’s decision to engage in hostilities against Iran and about its lack of strategy moving forward,” Pelosi said in her statement.

Story continues below advertisement

“Congress hereby directs the President to terminate the use of United States Armed Forces to engage in hostilities in or against Iran or any part of its government or military” unless Congress declares war on that country or enacts legislation authorizing use of force to prevent an attack on the U.S. and its forces, the five-page resolution says.

Click to play video: 'Middle East Counter Terrorism expert explains American-Iran tension and implications'
Middle East Counter Terrorism expert explains American-Iran tension and implications

“I think it’s extremely important that we as a country, if we are going to — either intentionally or accidentally — slide into war, that we have a debate about it,” said freshman Rep. Elissa Slotkin, D-Mich., the measure’s sponsor. Slotkin is a former CIA analyst and Pentagon official who served in Iraq.

“I want to understand … what’s your strategy?” she said, referring to the Trump administration. “How do you know you’re succeeding and not just escalating us into something more and more dangerous? We are owed concrete, specific details on strategy.”

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: Donald Trump says Iran appears to be ‘standing down’ following missile strike

Read next: Priscilla Presley contests validity of Lisa Marie Presley’s will

The showdown between the White House and Capitol Hill was the latest example of Trump’s willingness to break the norms in Washington. Trump did not consult with congressional leaders ahead of the attack that killed the Iranian general and afterward sent Congress a notification explaining the rationale, but kept it classified.

Congress has allowed its war powers role to erode since the passage of Authorization for Use of Military Force in 2001 to fight terrorism after the 9-11 attacks, and passage of another AUMF for the invasion of Iraq in 2002.

Click to play video: 'U.S. Senator Lee calls Iran crisis briefing ‘The worst briefing I’ve seen’'
U.S. Senator Lee calls Iran crisis briefing ‘The worst briefing I’ve seen’

Fallout from those votes deeply divided Congress and the nation, with many lawmakers, particularly Democrats, now saying they were mistakes. Yet Congress has been paralyzed on the question of whether to repeal or change those authorities.

Story continues below advertisement

Trump, facing one of the greatest tests of his presidency, said Wednesday that Iran appeared to be “standing down” and said the U.S. response would be to put in place new economic sanctions “until Iran changes its behaviour.”

READ MORE: Reality check: Trump distorts facts on Iran payout, Islamic State’s continuing threat

Read next: Father charged with attempted murder after allegedly driving family off cliff in California

The strikes by Iran had pushed Tehran and Washington perilously close to all-out conflict and put the world’s attention on Trump as he weighed whether to respond with more military force.

Republicans have largely supported Trump’s actions, saying the president was well within his power to take out Iran’s architect of proxy operations against Americans in the Middle East. The U.S. considered Soleimani a terrorist.

Click to play video: 'Still many unanswered questions regarding U.S.-Iran crisis: Schumer'
Still many unanswered questions regarding U.S.-Iran crisis: Schumer

“How much is enough? How many more Americans did Soleimani need to kill before somebody supports taking him out?” asked Louisiana Rep. Steve Scalise, the No. 2 Republican in the House. The world is a safer place without Soleimani in it, he added.

Story continues below advertisement

Democrats were unconvinced that the threat posed by Soleimani was imminent or that other alternatives to the killing were pursued in good faith. By not disclosing many details of the threat, Trump was asking the American public to trust the very intelligence reports he has often disparaged, Democrats said.

READ MORE: New air defences needed in wake of Iran attack, Canadian Army says

Read next: Calgary man searches for group of women who helped him emigrate to Canada 3 decades ago

Some Republicans also criticized the briefing by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo and other top officials. Sen. Mike Lee of Utah said it was “probably the worst briefing I’ve seen, at least on a military issue,” in the nine years he’s served in the Senate.

Lee called it “distressing” that officials suggested it would only embolden Iran if lawmakers debated the merits of further military action. He walked into the briefing undecided, Lee said, but left it favouring the war powers resolution being offered by Kaine.

Click to play video: '‘We owe it to the American people to prevent war’: U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar'
‘We owe it to the American people to prevent war’: U.S. Representative Ilhan Omar

“It is not acceptable for officials within the executive branch of government … to come in and tell us that we can’t debate and discuss the appropriateness of military intervention against Iran,” Lee said. “It’s un-American, it’s unconstitutional, and it’s wrong.”

Story continues below advertisement

Pelosi said the House may also consider additional legislation to repeal the 2002 Iraq authorization of force and a separate bill to prohibit funding for military action against Iran not authorized by Congress.

Sponsored content