No imminent plans for Sask. small modular nuclear reactors: Duncan

Saskatchewan Environment Minister Dustin Duncan discusses early plans to explore adding nuclear energy to the province's power grid on Dec. 2, 2019. Dave Parsons / Global News
Saskatchewan is signed onto a memorandum of understanding [MOU] to explore adding small modular nuclear reactors (SMRs) to the power grid, alongside Ontario and New Brunswick, but don’t expect reactors in the province for at least the next 10 years.

The goal is to help provide emission-free power in the move away from fossil fuel-burning electricity. However, the minister responsible for SaskPower said Saskatchewan still has a lot to learn about the technology before making concrete plans.

“An SMR is not imminent for Saskatchewan, but I would say it is probably within the middle part of the next decade we would likely see the first SMR in North American south of the border,” Dustin Duncan said.

Story continues below advertisement

“What I understand from Ontario and New Brunswick, they could be soon after that, within the next decade. So I think it is coming, still lots to learn about it, but that’s part of what our MOU is.”

READ MORE: Premiers Moe, Ford, Higgs to collaborate on development of nuclear reactors in Canada

Read next: ‘Not the first time’ a Chinese surveillance balloon passed over U.S.: ambassador

Possible locations for SMRs in Saskatchewan could be the southeast corner around Estevan or Coronach and the north.

Duncan said this is due to an abundance of transmission infrastructure attached to coal plants that will be decommissioned in the south, and electricity needs in the north due to many homes using it for heating.

However, the federal process to approve a potential nuclear site is lengthy.

“Obviously New Brunswick and Ontario are ahead of Saskatchewan because they already have nuclear power sites; they’re already licensed to host a nuclear site,” Duncan said.

“We don’t have a site at this point. Our first step would be to really get a better sense of the technology.”

READ MORE: Are small nuclear reactors really better? Here are the pros and cons

Read next: Liberals ‘didn’t quite get it right’ on C-21 firearms amendment: minister

Duncan said this MOU signed between the premiers builds on a pre-existing agreement between Saskatchewan and Ontario’s power corporations.

Story continues below advertisement

This has Opposition Leader Ryan Meili saying the agreement is interesting for not being interesting.

“It looks like another photo op for Scott Moe and Doug Ford. They brought in New Brunswick this time, but it doesn’t seem to give any real details,” Meili said.

Meili added there are many questions around what this will cost and the MOU is light on those details.

“Right now, I think this MOU adds almost nothing to the conversation,” Meili said.

The NDP leader said he does think SMRs are worth exploring and it could be a good way to get more value for Saskatchewan uranium.

A small team at SaskPower is currently working on what it would take to add SMRs to the grid.

READ MORE: Saskatchewan giving early consideration for small nuclear reactors

Read next: Ukraine’s Zelenskyy revokes citizenship of numerous former politicians

The premiers of Saskatchewan, Ontario and New Brunswick have all been vocal opponents of the federal carbon tax.

Moe has said the carbon tax won’t generate meaningful emission reductions in Saskatchewan, and technological advancements are the way to get more meaningful reductions.

Federal officials have said the goal of the carbon price is to change behaviour.

Story continues below advertisement

Despite Saskatchewan eyeing a major shift in baseload power generation, Duncan said he does not believe this is a signal the carbon tax is changing behaviour.

“When you look at individuals that are paying the carbon tax, again ss I’ve argued in the past, certainly we don’t think it’s going to see a change in behaviour,” Duncan said.

“That being said, as a utility we know we have large-scale generation that needs to be replaced. Certainly, coal beyond 2030 without carbon capture is not going to be allowed in Canada, but even natural gas has additional costs attached to it through a carbon tax.”

A decision on whether or not to expand carbon capture technology to extend the life of the coal-fired Shand Power station is still years away.

SaskPower previously paused the development of a new natural gas power station near Moose Jaw due to changing carbon tax regulations. The Crown utility ultimately decided to move ahead despite an extra $350 million in estimated costs.

Sponsored content