_848x480_1435568707728.jpg?w=1040&quality=70&strip=all)
The possible transfer of hundreds of sour gas wells, pipelines and other facilities from an energy giant to a much smaller company has raised concerns about Alberta’s efforts to ensure taxpayers don’t get stuck with the cleanup bill.
READ MORE: Alberta oil and gas producer cleanup cost estimates set too low, coalition says
Last summer, Shell Canada agreed to sell 284 wells, 66 facilities and 82 pipelines in the southern Alberta foothills to Pieridae Energy, a Calgary-based company with a market value less than the price of the assets. Its stock price is under $1.
READ MORE: Cover-ups, lies ‘a systemic cancer’ in world of oilpatch health and safety breaches: whistleblowers
The purchase is part of a plan to move Alberta gas to a yet-to-be-built, $10-billion liquefied natural gas plant in Nova Scotia, from where it would be shipped to Europe. Pieridae says it is eligible for a $4.5-billion loan from the German government for the project.
The Alberta Energy Regulator must approve the transfer, a decision it must make as it copes with a growing list of wells, pipelines and other infrastructure abandoned by companies that went bankrupt during the energy price slump.
Since January, the number of wells transferred to the Orphan Well Association has increased to 3,400 from 3,100. Alberta’s cleanup spending is budgeted at $70 million by 2023 — a more than 50 per cent increase in otherwise belt-tightening times.
Get weekly money news
READ MORE: Bankrupt energy companies can’t abandon old oil wells, Supreme Court rules
The regulator has promised a closer eye on licence transfers to ensure purchasers are able to cover reclamation costs.
“We … are broadening our assessment processes to allow for a more holistic approach to assess a company’s ability to address its end-of-life obligations,” said an email from regulator spokesman Shawn Roth.
“The AER will assess the proposed transfer to determine whether regulatory requirements have been satisfied and whether a security deposit will be required.”
The Shell-Pieridae sale is a test case, suggested Shaun Fluker, a University of Calgary law professor.
“You would think these assets fit under that discussion,” he said. “They keep talking about wanting to rework the existing policy they have for ensuring assets are properly looked after.
“At some point they’re going to have to be proactive and take steps to make sure that happens.”
READ MORE: Failure of Calgary-based junior oil and gas producer threatens to create up to 1,400 orphan wells
Pieridae spokesman James Millar said in an email that Shell will cover any contamination from when it owned the sites — although that doesn’t include the cost of reclaiming the sites themselves.
Millar wrote that Pieridae is “still working through” those costs.
“We did consider the asset retirement obligation of the assets before we purchased them.”
He points out that Shell had planned to close the field, which would have been a severe blow to nearby communities such as Pincher Creek. Pieridae plans a new drilling program and says the purchase would be profitable almost right away.
READ MORE: Investigation finds misuse of funds, scant oversight at Alberta Energy Regulator
Fluker said Albertans deserve more than company assurances that those who profit from the province’s resources are able to clean up their mess. This sale is a chance to establish clear, publicly understood rules for such transfers, he said.
Judd just wants to be able to believe that the wells and pipelines pumping toxic sour gas near his home will be cleaned up safely.
“Our children and our grandchildren are going to end up with an environmental cleanup that is way beyond their capability to deal with,” he said.
“We in Alberta have gotten way too used to backroom deals and backroom regulators that are not transparent.”
READ MORE: The hidden cost of abandoned oil and gas wells in Alberta
Comments