Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Comments closed.

Due to the sensitive and/or legal subject matter of some of the content on globalnews.ca, we reserve the ability to disable comments from time to time.

Please see our Commenting Policy for more.

Joshua Megeney inquest ends with 4 recommendations for Saskatoon police

WATCH ABOVE: Jury makes 4 recommendations at the conclusion of the Joshua Megeney inquest – Jun 28, 2019

Joshua Megeney’s family will forever be grateful for a jury’s efforts examining the Saskatoon Police Service (SPS)’s actions, according to the lawyer for relatives of the late 28-year-old.

Story continues below advertisement

Scott Spencer said Megeney’s father in particular stated it is important for Saskatoon police to learn from the shooting death on Oct. 6, 2016, and the recommendations “are a good start.”

“As difficult as the week was … they said this was a valuable process. They appreciate the opportunity,” Spencer said following the inquest’s conclusion on Friday.

Officers first engaged with Megeney after responding to a break-and-enter call on Avenue Q North two-and-a-half years ago. After sweeping the garage and home, they reached a locked bedroom door and smashed it. They managed to open the door slightly in a process known as a “breach.”

The daily email you need for 's top news stories.

Three officers testified during the inquest to seeing Megeney holding a rifle on the other side of the door. According to their testimony, he aimed it at them twice.

Story continues below advertisement

Police fired three shots. One of the bullets struck the suspect in the head, killing him instantly, according to the province’s chief forensic pathologist. An autopsy also found the 28-year-old had meth in his body before his death.

A jury consisting of four women and two men deemed the death a homicide – an intentional killing. However, under an inquest’s definition, a homicide does not mean it was a criminal act.

Jurors issued recommendations including a review of policies around the “breach and retreat” method exercised by police. They also called for standardized negotiation and communication training for members of the tactical support unit.

Other recommendations included additional protocols for the on-scene lead officer to be able to request appropriate resources. Tactical support unit members should also have a “wide range” of surveillance tools in their vehicles, according to the jury’s recommendations.

Story continues below advertisement

A Saskatoon police spokesperson stated the service needs time to review the recommendations. Chief Troy Cooper will likely be available for interviews next week, the SPS spokesperson said.

The Megeney family’s lawyer told reporters the inquest serves as “further evidence” that police agencies shouldn’t be investigating the actions of officers.

“After this week, I’ve come to the conclusion, and I believe, that nothing short of an independent civilian body reviewing these type of incidents can maintain the public confidence,” Spencer said.

Saskatchewan is one of the few Canadian provinces without a civilian, independent police watchdog agency.

An inquest is a fact-finding endeavor – not a trial – to determine the circumstances around a death and prevent similar instances from happening in the future.

Advertisement
Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article