Radiation therapy for throat cancer sees better quality of life outcome over robotic surgery, study suggests

Dr. David Palma, researcher at Lawson and radiation oncologist at London Health Sciences Centre.
Dr. David Palma, researcher at Lawson and radiation oncologist at London Health Sciences Centre. via

A seven-year long study by researchers at London’s Lawson Health Research Institute suggests precision radiation therapy results in a better quality of life for patients being treated for oropharyngeal, or throat cancer, compared to transoral robotic surgery (TORS).

The clinical trial, named ORATOR, began in 2012, and was the first in the world to compare the two treatments for the cancer. It involved 68 research participants and six centres across the country, including the London Regional Cancer Program at the London Health Sciences Centre, and was funded by the Canadian Cancer Society.

READ MORE: Lawson Health researchers develop new imaging tool to detect heart disease

As part of the study, participants were randomly selected to receive either treatment, Lawson said, adding radiation therapy is often combined with chemotherapy.

The study, the results of which were shared May 31 at the annual meeting of the American Society of Clinical Oncology, found that while survival rates were equal between the two treatments, participants who received radiation experienced better swallowing outcomes.

Story continues below advertisement

“A mild decline in swallowing function was observed in 40 per cent of the surgery participants compared to 26 per cent of radiation participants,” read a statement from Lawson. “All participants were able to eat a full diet after treatment but 16 per cent from the surgery group said they needed to specially prepare their food.”

READ MORE: Lawson study will examine how smart technology can serve those with mental illness

Click to play video: 'Study finds cancer clusters in some industrial cities' Study finds cancer clusters in some industrial cities
Study finds cancer clusters in some industrial cities – May 28, 2019

TORS involves the use of a small 3D camera and tiny robotic instruments to remove a patient’s tumours. While early studies suggested it would be better for lowering the risk of developing swallowing issues that are commonly found with radiation treatment, the findings of the ORATOR study challenge that idea, said Lawson associate scientist and LHSC radiation oncologist, Dr. David Palma.

Palma conducted the study alongside Dr. Anthony Nichols, an associate scientist at Lawson and a head and neck cancer surgeon at LHSC — the first centre in the country to offer the TORS procedure.

Story continues below advertisement

“Treatments have advanced considerably and are now much more precise, which may be leading to better patient outcomes,” said Palma in a statement. The study also found that those receiving TORS were at more risk of experiencing dangerous bleeding during the surgery procedure, and increased chance of pain and painkiller use one later later.

However, researchers said those who were treated with radiation reported experiencing more short-term constipation, a temporary drop in blood counts, and an increased risk of tinnitus.

READ MORE: Combined procedure reduces re-injury in athletes after ACL knee surgery: study

A second trial, ORATOR 2, has been launched to further compare the two treatments but using 140 participants.

In a statement, Lawson said rates of the cancer have more than doubled in the last two decades, with a significant uptick in cases caused by human papillomavirus.

Sponsored content