Advertisement

Ontario court orders new trial for man convicted of sexually assaulting friend after wedding

Click to play video: '‘We’re sending a clear message to people who cause harm that they can make excuses.’: Farrah Khan'
‘We’re sending a clear message to people who cause harm that they can make excuses.’: Farrah Khan
WATCH ABOVE: Farrah Khan with Ryerson University's Office of Sexual Violence Support and Education tells Global News she's dismayed by a judge's ruling that people accused of sexual assault in Ontario are once again allowed to use excessive intoxication as a defence against criminal charges. (Aug. 30) – Aug 30, 2018

Ontario’s top court has ordered a new trial for a Toronto man convicted of sexually assaulting a friend after an out-of-town wedding, saying the judge who oversaw the case erred in his instructions to the jury.

Paul Chafe was found guilty in 2017 in connection with an incident that took place five years earlier in Kitchener, Ont., where he, his girlfriend and a mutual longtime friend had gone for a wedding.

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

The three were sharing a suite in a Conestoga College residence hall but had separate rooms, with the couple in one and the friend in the other.

The complainant, who cannot be identified, alleged she was sexually assaulted in her room during the night after the group and several other wedding guests returned to the residence hall following the reception.

Story continues below advertisement

She identified Chafe as the man she had seen masturbating in her doorway, and believed he was also the one who had allegedly done so in her bed later that night.

In a decision released this month, the Court of Appeal for Ontario found the judge failed to properly caution jurors on the dangers inherent to eyewitness identification and failed to give guidance on how to assess evidence related to Chafe’s reaction to the allegations.

Sponsored content

AdChoices