Donald Trump can’t block people on Twitter, judge rules

Click to play video: 'U.S. judge rules Trump can’t block people on Twitter' U.S. judge rules Trump can’t block people on Twitter
WATCH: A U.S. District Court judge ruled Wednesday that President Donald Trump cannot block people on Twitter, saying it is a violation of the First Amendment – May 23, 2018

NEW YORK – President Donald Trump violates the U.S. Constitution’s First Amendment when he blocks critics on Twitter for political speech, a judge ruled Wednesday.

U.S. District Judge Naomi Reice Buchwald in Manhattan stopped short in her written decision of ordering Trump or a subordinate to stop the practice of blocking critics from viewing his Twitter account, saying it was enough to point out that it was unconstitutional to continue to do so.

READ MORE: Stephen King says Donald Trump blocked him on Twitter

“A declaratory judgment should be sufficient, as no government official – including the President – is above the law, and all government officials are presumed to follow the law as has been declared,” Buchwald wrote.

The case was brought last July by the Knight First Amendment Institute at Columbia University and seven individuals blocked by Trump after criticizing the Republican president.

Story continues below advertisement

The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a message. A government lawyer did not respond to an email request for comment.

WATCH: Will Trump’s twitter tirades come back to haunt him?

Click to play video: 'Will Trump’s twitter tirades come back to haunt him?' Will Trump’s twitter tirades come back to haunt him?
Will Trump’s twitter tirades come back to haunt him? – Dec 4, 2017

Jameel Jaffer, the Knight Institute’s executive director, said in a release that his organization was pleased.

“The president’s practice of blocking critics on Twitter is pernicious and unconstitutional, and we hope this ruling will bring it to an end,” he said.

The lawsuit was filed after Trump blocked some individuals from @realdonaldtrump, a 9-year-old Twitter account with over 50 million followers.

READ MORE: The ‘COVFEFE Act’: U.S. lawmaker wants to preserve Donald Trump’s tweets

Justice Department lawyers had argued that it was Trump’s prerogative, no different from the president deciding in a room filled with people not to listen to some.

Story continues below advertisement

Buchwald ruled that the tweets were made in a public forum.

READ MORE: Donald Trump’s Twitter: Here’s how the president’s tweets can affect the legal system

“The President presents the @realDonaldTrump account as being a presidential account as opposed to a personal account and, more importantly, uses the account to take actions that can be taken only by the President as President,” the judge said.

After a hearing this year, the judge had suggested that Trump mute rather than block some of his critics. At the time, a Justice Department attorney agreed that muting would enable Trump to avoid a tweet he doesn’t want to read.

Sponsored content