Advertisement

Enbridge shares fall after Minnesota judge issues Line 3 recommendation

In this July 25, 2017, photo provided by Wisconsin Public Radio, crews begin work on the Wisconsin segment of Enbridge Energy's Line 3 near Superior, Wis.
In this July 25, 2017, photo provided by Wisconsin Public Radio, crews begin work on the Wisconsin segment of Enbridge Energy's Line 3 near Superior, Wis. (Elizabeth McMahon/Wisconsin Public Radio via AP)

CALGARY – Shares in Enbridge Inc. closed down more than five per cent on Tuesday, the day after a judge in Minnesota recommended that its Line 3 pipeline replacement project follow the existing route across the state rather than the company’s preferred route.

Enbridge traded as low as $37.53 before ending the day at $37.68, down $2.14, on the Toronto Stock Exchange.

WATCH BELOW: Construction begins on Line 3 pipeline project as Trans Mountain faces hurdles

Click to play video: 'Construction begins on Line 3 pipeline project as Trans Mountain faces hurdles'
Construction begins on Line 3 pipeline project as Trans Mountain faces hurdles
Story continues below advertisement

The administrative law judge’s report could mean delays for the project if the Minnesota Public Utilities Commission adopts her recommendation, analysts at Desjardins Capital Markets said in a report. A vote is expected in June.

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily National news

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Desjardins said utilizing the existing route would mean physically removing the old pipe and replacing it, a process that would require Enbridge to stop oil shipments for about 16 months, effectively removing 390,000 barrels per day of crude oil takeaway capacity.

The existing route crosses two Ojibwe Native American reservations where tribal governments have voiced opposition to replacing the line, setting up the potential for future disputes, Desjardins said.

Judge Ann O’Reilly wrote that Enbridge has established that the project is needed, but that the negative consequences to Minnesota of the company’s more southerly preferred route outweigh the benefits. The cost-benefit analysis shifts in favour of approving the project if Enbridge builds the pipeline in Line 3’s existing trench, she said.

O’Reilly’s recommendations aren’t binding on the commission, but they’re the product of an extensive public hearing and comment process.
Commission Chair Nancy Lange acknowledged at a hearing last month that whatever the commission decides, the dispute is likely to end up in court.

Enbridge said in a statement that it was pleased the judge listened to the extensive evidence for the need for the project, and will be taking time to review the recommendation that it use the existing right-of-way.

Advertisement

Sponsored content

AdChoices