Advertisement

Investigation process into Jamie Baillie was fair says interim leader of Nova Scotia PCs

Tara Miller, PC Party president, and Karla MacFarlane, interim leader of the PC party speak at a presentation on Jan. 24, 2018. Alexander Quon/Global News

The investigation by Nova Scotia’s Progressive Conservative Party into an allegation of inappropriate behaviour by former leader Jamie Baillie was fair, the party’s interim leader said Tuesday.

Karla MacFarlane said she believes the use of a third-party Halifax-based lawyer was fair to both Baillie and a party staffer at the centre of the allegation.

“They both had no complaints during the investigation of the process,” MacFarlane told reporters.

READ MORE: After sex scandals, calls grow for stronger sexual misconduct policies in Canadian politics

Baillie, who announced plans last fall to step down after serving as Tory leader since 2010, was forced to quit immediately last week after the party’s investigation found he acted inappropriately and breached the legislature’s policy on workplace harassment.

Breaking news from Canada and around the world sent to your email, as it happens.

A news release issued Friday by party president Tara Miller said both participants chose not to follow the formal process laid out in the legislature’s harassment policy, although definitions from the policy were used to make findings which concluded that Baillie was in breach.

Story continues below advertisement

MacFarlane said the formal process wasn’t used because the complaint was brought to the party and not the caucus – something party officials had previously stated.

“I would never foster a culture of silence, so I am very proud of the steps that we took.”

WATCH: Nova Scotia politicians react to Jamie Baillie dismissal

Click to play video: 'Nova Scotia politicians react to Jamie Baillie dismissal'
Nova Scotia politicians react to Jamie Baillie dismissal

MacFarlane said she feels the legislature’s policy is a good one, but she’s open to looking at any additions if anyone feels they are needed.

In last week’s statement, Miller said says she was told by “multiple sources” about a single incident that took place against “one individual” in December.

A caucus spokeswoman later clarified that the initial information Miller received did not come directly from the individual at the centre of the complaint. She said it was the result of that person telling other people – who then went to the party president.

Advertisement

Sponsored content

AdChoices