Communities affected by an oil spill into the North Saskatchewan River are being told it’s OK to start using the water again.
Saskatchewan’s Water Security Agency said the cities of North Battleford, Prince Albert and Melfort can resume taking water from the river.
READ MORE: Independent report looks at Husky response to Saskatchewan oil spill
The cities had to shut off their intakes and find alternate water sources after the oil plume from a Husky Energy (TSE:HSE) pipeline spill moved downstream.
Up to 250,000 litres of oil mixed with a lighter hydrocarbon leaked into the river near Maidstone, Sask., in July.
Get daily National news
The water agency said about 88 per cent of the oil has been recovered and there is no significant health risk once the water is treated.
The agency recommends municipalities collect samples of treated water to test for petroleum components before the water is distributed to users.
It also says they should adjust their water treatment to address current river conditions and advise users of a potential change in water quality.
READ MORE: First batch of birds released after recovering from Husky oil spill
Restrictions on livestock watering and recreational activities on the river have also been removed. The cities had already lifted municipal restrictions that were in place for several weeks after the spill to conserve water.
The agency said the oil spill’s impact on aquatic life and wildlife is still being reviewed. Almost 150 animals were found dead, mostly fish and small mammals.
It’s still not clear what caused the spill. The government has said a full investigation is expected to conclude next month.
WATCH BELOW: Coverage of the Husky Energy oil spill near Maidstone into the North Saskatchewan River
- Donald Trump claims B.C.’s ‘very large faucet’ could help California’s water woes
- U.S. TikTok ban case pits free speech vs. national security. Which will win?
- A final, tragic text from doomed Titan sub revealed at Coast Guard hearing
- Meta bans RT, other Russian state media outlets over ‘foreign interference’
Comments