Advertisement

Halifax mayor Mike Savage calls for bigger boundaries for proposed Blue Mountain park

Click to play video: 'Controversial report on wilderness park to be debated at council'
Controversial report on wilderness park to be debated at council
WATCH ABOVE: Halifax Regional Council will debate whether the proposed boundaries for a wilderness park, 10 years in the making, should be made bigger. The debate slated for next Tuesday, follows a report that recommended the park be made much smaller than anticipated. Global's Marieke Walsh explains – Jul 19, 2016

Mayor Mike Savage says a June report proposing a smaller than anticipated wilderness park north-west of Bayers Lake misses the mark.

Savage weighed in on the controversy Tuesday after council decided to debate the issue next week. The regional park is supposed to sit adjacent to the provincially protected Blue Mountain – Birch Cove Lakes Wilderness Area.

At issue is whether a report released last month found the right balance between the interests of developers who own some of the land where the city wants to put a park and the interests of the public.

In 2014 the city appointed Justice Heather Robertson to sort out a plan for Halifax to buy back the land from developers.

READ MORE: Battle brewing over Blue Mountain park development plans

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily National news

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Based on the 2006 Regional Plan, advocates expected the park to have the boundaries outlined in Map 13 of the plan. Instead the boundaries proposed by Robertson suggest the companies should keep some of the land for development while selling a much smaller parcel back to the city.

Story continues below advertisement

“In my view the facilitators report is not a starting point,” Savage said. “I think we can do more, to protect more land and that’s all I would say right now.”

Local councillor, Reg Rankin, proposed next week’s debate at council. He’s hoping councillors will reject Robertson’s report in favour of a larger boundary but neither Savage, nor Rankin will say how big they think the park should be.

A lost decade’: Ecology Action Centre

The park’s boundaries aren’t what the city should be debating according to the Ecology Action Centre. The advocacy group says the 2006 Regional Plan set the expectations for the size of the park and now council needs to focus on how it can make that happen.

“There is no question in the public’s mind that a promise was made on this regional park and that’s what needs to be delivered by council,” Ecology Action Centre wilderness coordinator Raymond Plourde said. “The only question is how much, not where the boundaries should be.”

Robertson’s report shows a wide gulf in what the developers think their land is worth and what the city wants to pay. Savage said council is willing to invest in green space but “not at any cost.”

There is no timeline for when council has to make a decision on the park.

Story continues below advertisement

The inaction amounts to a “lost decade” Plourde said. “That’s not the public’s fault, that’s council’s fault.”

Council will debate the boundaries for the proposed park on Tuesday.

Sponsored content

AdChoices