Advertisement

Bluenose II documents suggest U.S. regulator was designer’s 2nd choice

Bluenose II sits at berth in Lunenburg, N.S. on Sept. 24, 2014. Andrew Vaughan/The Canadian Press

HALIFAX – The classification society chosen to evaluate the Bluenose II might not have been the first choice of the schooner’s designer, according to documents released Tuesday.

The documents (presented at the bottom of this story), obtained by Global News through a Freedom of Information request, detail the process of selecting a regulator to ensure the ship was built to specific standards.

In February 2010, the Bluenose II’s designer, Lengkeek Vessel Engineering (LVE), prepared a report for government officials about which regulators — or classification societies — were available to do the job.

READ MORE: Bluenose II coverage from Global News

Ship owners often seek classification from international regulatory agencies because it usually guarantees a well-built vessel.

In the case of the Bluenose II, designers seem to have preferred the classification society Lloyd’s Register (LR) over the American Bureau of Shipping (ABS), although the firm’s final written preference was redacted from the documents obtained by Global News.

Story continues below advertisement
“On a world wide [sic] scale LR has a much larger share of the wooden vessels in their classification,” reads a memo prepared by LVE, which is dated Feb. 22, 2010.
“LVE has a long working relationship with this office [Lloyd’s] and I know one of the senior surveyors has a keen interest in wooden boats.”

READ MORE: Bluenose II regulator questions ship’s stability report

The memo states that the ABS has a larger share of the overall boat market in North America, “however, the majority of the vessels have their load-line assigned by ABS, but the vessels are not fully classified by ABS.”

Breaking news from Canada and around the world sent to your email, as it happens.

The document also outlines the rule books — the in-house naval building codes — used by each society.

Lloyd’s would use two books: one for wooden ships and a second for building yachts.

READ MORE: Bluenose II inspection reveals dozens of deficiencies

“The first rules are very old and very interesting to read. The second set of rules is applicable to yacht with a length not exceeding 50 [metres], which covers the length of the Bluenose which is 43.5 [metres],” the memo states.
Story continues below advertisement

The ABS would also use two books: one for wooden ships and one for offshore racing yachts.

“The first rules are very good for the re-design of the Bluenose, specifically to the components which are of traditional construction. The Offshore Racing Yachts cover in principle only to yacht of 30 [metres] in length, but can to some extent by extrapolated for the longer Bluenose.”

In the years since ABS was chosen for the job, a third rule book, titled Rules for Building and Classing Steel Vessels, was added. ABS officials have told Global News that individual regulations for the Bluenose II’s construction have been taken from each of the three books, which is the main reason why the wooden schooner has a steel rudder.

READ MORE: 4 things you didn’t know are sending the Bluenose II project awry

The ABS was ultimately hired to do the job. Cost estimates for each organization were redacted from the documents.

The explanation, found in a second memo dated May 7, 2010, states the ABS “has lowered their price and LR has been very slow to respond to our request for a formal proposal and it is expected that since the sinking of the sailing vessel ‘Concordia’ LR is not as keen anymore in the project.”

In February 2010, the 57-metre Concordia sank off the coast of Brazil. The ship was operated by West Island College, and all staff and students on board were safely rescued. The ship’s captain blamed the capsizing on a downward wind called a “microburst.” The ship was built and classed to Lloyd’s Register standards, although it was not found responsible in any way for the wreck.

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: Bluenose file was given to wrong department: Darrow

Global News requested more information from the project’s current manager, deputy minister David Darrow, but he was not available for comment at the time of publication.

The Bluenose II is at least $4.9 million over-budget and more than three years late. Officials say the vessel might be able to sail by next spring.

Read the documents detailing the classification society options for the Bluenose II:

Sponsored content

AdChoices