Advertisement

B.C. child sex assault charges stayed after judge finds unreasonable delays

Click to play video: 'Child sexual assault charges stayed over delays'
Child sexual assault charges stayed over delays
Charges against a man who was accused of sexually assaulting a six-year-old girl have been stayed because a Provincial Court judge ruled it's taken too long to bring them to trial. Kristen Robinson reports. – Jul 24, 2024

A British Columbia judge says trial delays for a man accused of sexually assaulting a six-year-old girl went beyond a “ceiling” set by the Supreme Court of Canada as he stayed the case more than two years after charges were laid.

Provincial court Judge Mayland McKimm says in a decision released in May that the man was accused of sexually assaulting the child at his family home when she and her mother attended a “pre-Christmas festive meal” in December 2021.

Click to play video: 'Sheriff shortage blamed for B.C. courtroom closures'
Sheriff shortage blamed for B.C. courtroom closures

The ruling says the child told her mother of the man’s “inappropriate behaviour” the next day, and the woman confronted him in his home with his wife present, secretly recording the interaction on her phone in an exchange that occurred “fluently” between Mandarin and Cantonese.

Story continues below advertisement

McKimm’s decision says the mother provided the recording and a “purported transcript” to police, and the man — only identified by his initials in the ruling — was charged in May 2022, but the Crown’s “failure” to assign a prosecutor to the case led to a three-month delay before the man’s trial could be set.

Click to play video: 'Crown blames defence for delays in Ibrahim Ali’s murder trial'
Crown blames defence for delays in Ibrahim Ali’s murder trial

The ruling outlines a number of other delays that plagued the case, including a Cantonese interpreter’s failure to show up to court, the man’s lawyer falling ill, a witness being diagnosed with cancer, and a failure to ask the semi-retired trial judge to hear the case during “non-sitting months.”

Get daily Canada news delivered to your inbox so you'll never miss the day's top stories.

Get daily National news

Get daily Canada news delivered to your inbox so you'll never miss the day's top stories.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

The ruling says the delays in the case went beyond the 18-month limit set by the Supreme Court of Canada for timely trials, warning that a “court scheduling model” that can’t handle trials that take “longer than anticipated … will sadly lead to cases such as these simply taking too long to complete.”

Advertisement

Sponsored content

AdChoices