OTTAWA – The Federal Court of Appeal has largely upheld a landmark ruling that could vastly expand the ranks of people considered Indians under the Constitution.
A Federal Court ruling last year brought Metis and non-status Indians into the ranks of people considered “Indians” under the Constitution.
READ MORE: Government to appeal court ruling that Metis, other natives are ‘Indian’
On Thursday, the appeals court upheld part of that decision – ruling that only Metis are included as Indians under the Constitution, but not non-status Indians.
The case dragged on for years before last year’s ruling.
READ MORE: Supreme Court sides with Metis in historic Manitoba land claim dispute
The Congress of Aboriginal Peoples and several Metis and non-status Indians took the federal government to court in 1999, alleging discrimination because they were not considered “Indians” under a section of the Constitution Act.
If the decision is left to stand, it would vastly expand Ottawa’s responsibilities for hundreds of thousands of aboriginal people in Canada who are not affiliated with specific reserves and have essentially no access to First Nations programs, services and rights.
- ‘Summer of discontent’ coming over public service in-office order: unions
- Panera to remove ‘Charged Sips’ drink from Canada amid wrongful death lawsuits
- Minister Boissonnault to testify before ethics committee over ties to lobbyist, PPE company
- Family says infant killed in 401 crash leaves a ‘void that can never be filled’
Comments