Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.

Vancouver council moves away from ‘living wage’ policy in closed-door meeting

WATCH: For the first time, Victoria's so-called living wage -- the wage two people must earn to support a family of four -- surpassed Metro Vancouver's, driven higher by the high cost of food and shelter. Kylie Stanton reports – Nov 17, 2022

A decision made at a closed-door city council meeting earlier this year may mean Vancouver is no longer a certified “living wage” employer.

Story continues below advertisement

The City of Vancouver implemented its living wage policy in 2017, an initiative that guaranteed all civic employees and contractors were paid a wage that meets the basic needs of a family of four.

The living wage is set and certified by an organization called the Living Wage for Families Campaign. The group’s latest assessment in November saw the living wage jump 17 per cent to $24.08 per hour for Metro Vancouver.

At an in-camera meeting at the end of January, council voted to adopt a “revised approach” to the living wage, moving to hold minimum compensation to a five-year moving average of the living wage, rather than basing it on the annual figure.

Story continues below advertisement

The decision was made public Thursday, two days after the city approved a 2023 budget which included a $28.9 million increase in funding for the Vancouver Police Department and a 10.7 per cent property tax hike.

In a statement, the city said annual fluctuations in the living wage made administering the program difficult for large employers.

“Particularly those with multi-year collective agreements like the City. Where the annual Living Wage has decreased in the past, the City has not decreased wages and asked service providers to do the same,” it said.

“Due to the immediate impact the new Living Wage rate would have on the pay structure for the rest of the City and the possibility the rate may be reduced in future years, Council made the decision to implement a fair wage approach based on a rolling five-year average of the Living Wage rate.”

Story continues below advertisement

In a statement, Mayor Ken Sim reiterated the reasons for the change given by the city, adding that the majority of city workers are already paid more than the living wage.

“Due to the immediate impact the new living wage rate calculation would have on the pay structure for the rest of the City, and the possibility the rate may be reduced in future years,” Sim said.

“We are fully committed to the principle of fairly compensating the employees of the City and the City’s service providers.”

Story continues below advertisement

The city said it would base its five-year average on the Living Wage for Families Campaign’s figures, and hoped the organization would allow it to remain a certified living wage employer.

The Living Wage for Families Campaign, however, appears cool to that possibility.

In a statement, the organization’s provincial manager Anastasia French called the move “incredibly disappointing” and “against the spirit of the living wage.”

“People across the city are struggling to pay for the cost of essentials right now, not the cost of rent or food averaged out from 5 years ago,” French said.

“Working poverty has enormous fiscal implications for social programs, health care costs, education, employment, and criminality. Paying city workers the Living Wage is a key solution to solving these issues.”

According to the organization, calculating a wage based on the current five-year average would produce hourly pay of $20.90, more than $3 lower than the current living wage.

Story continues below advertisement

French also slammed the city for making the decision behind closed doors, saying the public should have had an opportunity to weigh in.

City council rules mean that individual councillors are the only ones permitted to say how they voted on in-camera decision.

OneCity Coun. Boyle said she had voted against the change.

“This is an unacceptable decision. It gets more expensive to live in this city every day. We should be figuring out how to pay working people enough to live here, not making it harder and harder for them to make ends meet,” she said in a statement.

“In the recent municipal election, voters told every party that affordability was a top issue. Not one party ran on reducing working people’s wages.”

Green Coun. Pete Fry posted to twitter that both he and his caucus colleague Coun. Adrianne Carr “have been, and remain committed to (a living wage) for workers for City of Vancouver.”

Advertisement
Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article