Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.

B.C. worker who said he refused to wear mask due to religion has complaint dismissed by tribunal

Tthe British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal dismssed a complaint by a worker who was fired for refusing to wear a mask. Global News

The British Columbia Human Rights Tribunal dismissed a complaint by a worker who was fired for refusing to wear a mask.

Story continues below advertisement

The worker alleged that his religious beliefs prevented him from wearing a mask, and his dismissal constituted discrimination based on religion, a claim that tribunal member Steven Adamson rejected.

According to the screening decision, a recently hired worker arrived at an unnamed facility where he was told by a manager to wear a mask.

The worker refused, saying it was against his “religious creed.”

Story continues below advertisement

A manager confirmed that the worker could not enter the facility without a mask. A senior manager then terminated the worker’s contract for not wearing a mask.

According to the decision, the worker said, “We are all made in the image of God, a big part of our image that we all identify with is our face. To cover up our face arbitrarily dishonours God.”

The latest health and medical news emailed to you every Sunday.

The worker also said that the mask requirement infringed on his “God-given ability to breathe.”

In his decision, tribunal member Steven Adamson said the complainant failed to establish that his objection to masks was “grounded in a sincerely-held religious belief.”

“Rather, his objection is based on his opinion that wearing a mask does not stop the transmission of COVID‐19,” he wrote.

Story continues below advertisement
“This is not a belief protected by the [B.C. Human Rights] Code.”

The identities of the workers and employers were not revealed due to a publication ban.

Screening decisions are among the first steps in a tribunal investigation and are normally not made public, but Adamson said this decision was published due to a large volume of complaints alleging discrimination in connection with the requirement to wear face coverings indoors.

Story continues below advertisement

— With files from The Canadian Press

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article