Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.

Constituents in Alberta environment minister’s riding concerned over coal mining

After revoking it in May 2020, Alberta has brought back a 1976 policy protecting parts of the Rocky Mountains from open-pit coal mining. Eric Sorensen explains why – Feb 9, 2021

A municipal council in Alberta Environment Minister Jason Nixon’s constituency is the latest to express concern about the province’s plan to expand coal mining in the Rocky Mountains.

Story continues below advertisement

Clearwater County, which includes the town of Rocky Mountain House and about half the people Nixon represents in the legislature, voted unanimously Tuesday to send a letter to the United Conservative government.

Reeve Cammie Laird said the letter thanks the government for reinstating protections for the Rockies from surface coal mines and for reconsidering its decision not to hold public consultations. But it warns local people are worried.

“We’ll be adding to the letter with regard to the concerns that we’ve heard,” she said. “We received a number of emails and letters over the last month.”

Coun. Theresa Laing said she’s received about 400 emails and letters, only a couple of which support increased mining in the mountains.

“One of Canada’s natural wonders is our Rocky Mountains and we’re fortunate to have them in our backyard,” she said. “Coal mining and these wonders are a bad juxtaposition.”

Story continues below advertisement

Nixon, who is also government house leader, did not immediately respond to a request for comment.

Clearwater’s move brings to 28 the number of Alberta municipalities that have expressed some level of concern over how the government has handled its plan to dramatically expand the province’s metallurgical coal industry.

The municipalities range from Turner Valley, population 2,500, to the province’s four largest cities.

The level of concerns varies widely. The town of High River is demanding that all coal exploration be immediately stopped and that no new permits be granted. The community of Edson is asking that the government reopen existing mines that have been mothballed before permitting new ones.

Story continues below advertisement

Six First Nations are protesting as well. Two are challenging the province in court, have told coal companies they will oppose any proposed mine and have asked the federal government to step in on any future environmental reviews.

Everybody says the government should talk to the public before making such a large land-use decision.

Last spring, the government revoked a policy that had protected the summits and eastern slopes of the Rockies since 1976. The move was made without warning, late on the Friday afternoon before the May long weekend.

Opposition gradually built and more than 100,000 signatures were collected on petitions. Last month, Energy Minister Sonya Savage said the policy would be reinstated, no new exploration leases would be sold on protected land and mountaintop removal mines banned.

She did not revoke leases on thousands of hectares sold after the policy was revoked. Drilling and road-building on those leases may continue. As well, Savage’s ban on mountaintop removal mining doesn’t extend to other types of surface mines.

Story continues below advertisement

She has said public consultations on coal mining are to begin March 29. No details have been released, including how the consultations will be conducted, how long they will take or what questions will be asked.

Laird said the consultations should take place in person, given the unreliability of rural internet.

“Our community members have been very clear they want in-person consultation.”

She said it will be important for the government to consult widely, including with First Nations. She said the public should be asked not only how coal mining should proceed but whether it should go ahead at all.

“I think you need to ask both questions.”

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article