November 9, 2018 8:13 pm
Updated: November 9, 2018 8:51 pm

Matthew Whitaker’s appointment as U.S. acting attorney general may spur lawsuit

A debate has begun across the U.S. about whether acting attorney general Matthew Whitaker should recuse himself from the Russia probe, due to comments made in the past critical of the investigation. At the same time, protests have occurred across the U.S. calling for politicians to "save Mueller."

A A

U.S. Senate Democrats are considering legal action over President Donald Trump‘s appointment of a new acting attorney general, congressional sources said on Friday, as some outside experts called Trump’s move unconstitutional.

Trump on Wednesday named Matthew Whitaker to replace former Attorney General Jeff Sessions, who was forced out after months of attacks by Trump for recusing himself from an ongoing probe of Russian meddling in the 2016 presidential election.

WATCH: Democrats demand answers about Jeff Sessions’ resignation

The move made Whitaker supervisor of the investigation, which has hung over Trump’s presidency. Whitaker has criticized the probe in the past as too wide-ranging, a view that raised concerns among Democrats that Sessions’ ouster and Whitaker’s appointment might be a precursor to Trump moving to end it.

Senate Democrats were pondering suing Trump, the sources said, on the grounds that, in naming Whitaker, the president ignored a statutory line of succession at the Justice Department and deprived senators of their constitutional “advice and consent” role on some presidential appointments.

“The only two paths to that office are regular succession, and advice (and) consent,” said a source close to the Senate Judiciary Committee.


Story continues below

Democratic Senator Richard Blumenthal told Reuters late on Friday he was “considering action that might be brought against an interim appointment that violates the normal statutory line of succession and raises very serious constitutional questions.”

He said he was speaking only for himself and he hoped Republicans might join as plaintiffs if a lawsuit goes forward.

The Appointments Clause of the U.S. Constitution states that some senior government officials, known as “principal officers,” must be confirmed by the Senate.

READ MORE: Trump’s new attorney general advised company that scammed investors out of thousands — reports

Democrats, as the minority party in the Senate, might need some Republican support to have legal standing to sue Trump under the Appointments Clause, said Andrew Wright, who was a White House lawyer under former President Barack Obama.

The source close to the Senate Judiciary Committee said that Democrats were unsure whether they would reach out to Republicans to join the lawsuit, but said such a move was “not likely.”

Senator Lindsey Graham said no threat to the Russia probe being led by Special Counsel Robert Mueller is posed by Whitaker. “Mueller will be allowed to do his job,” said Graham, who earlier this year introduced legislation to protect Mueller, in a Friday interview on Fox News Radio.

‘Constitutional questions’

Senate Democratic leader Chuck Schumer said on Friday that Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein, a career Justice Department official already confirmed by the Senate, should have been named the new attorney general after Sessions was removed.

“You ignored the statutory line of succession,” Schumer said in a Nov. 9 letter to Trump. “The appointment of Mr. Whitaker is further clouded by unresolved constitutional questions about the legality of such an action.”

Then-Chief of Staff to the Attorney General Matthew Whitaker attends a roundtable discussion with foreign liaison officers at the Justice Department in Washington, U.S., August 29, 2018.

REUTERS/Allison Shelley/File Photo

Republican Senator Lindsey Graham, who earlier this year introduced legislation to protect Special Counsel Robert Mueller, who is conducting the probe, said Whitaker did not pose a threat to his work.

“Mueller will be allowed to do his job,” Graham said in a Friday interview on Fox News Radio.

John Yoo, a former Justice Department lawyer in the George W. Bush administration, said “the Supreme Court made clear that the Attorney General is a principal officer,” in a 1998 case.

“Therefore, Whitaker cannot serve as acting Attorney General … Any other officer in the Justice Department who was appointed through advice and consent can serve, including the Deputy AG, the solicitor general, and the assistant AGs,” said Yoo, now a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley.

Trump’s ouster of Sessions and appointment of Whitaker triggered concerns among lawmakers that the president planned to undermine Mueller’s probe into Russian meddling in the 2016 election and any collusion between Moscow and Trump’s campaign.

Restrictions on Trump

Republican Senator Susan Collins said in a statement on Friday that Mueller must be allowed to complete his investigation.

“I am concerned about comments that Acting Attorney General Matthew Whitaker has made regarding the Special Counsel and the parameters of his investigation,” she said. “We should bring to the Senate floor legislation that would put restrictions on the ability of President Donald Trump to fire the Special Counsel,” she added.

Trump said on Friday, as he was departing Washington for a trip to Paris, that he had not discussed the Mueller probe with Whitaker before appointing him, and it was up to Whitaker whether he wanted to be involved with the investigation.

READ MORE: New U.S. attorney general has been critical of Mueller investigation in the past

Speaking to reporters at the White House, Trump defended his choice of Whitaker, saying the former U.S. attorney for the southern district of Iowa had an excellent reputation and came highly recommended by former Iowa Governor Terry Branstad, who is now Trump’s ambassador to China.

At the same time, Trump repeatedly emphasized in his remarks to reporters that he did not know Whitaker, whom he tapped to replace Sessions on a temporary basis. “Matt Whitaker – I don’t know Matt Whitaker,” Trump said.

Last month, Trump said on the Fox News program Fox and Friends, “Matt Whitaker’s a great guy. I mean, I know Matt Whitaker.”

A Justice Department spokeswoman has said Whitaker would oversee all matters under the department’s jurisdiction, including the Mueller investigation.

Democrats have called on Whitaker to recuse himself.

Trump said, “No matter who I put in, they go after him … He’s a highly respected man, especially by law enforcement, and I think he’s going to do a great job.”

U.S. intelligence agencies have said Russia interfered in the 2016 election in an attempt to tip it towards Trump and away from his Democratic opponent, former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton.

Russia has denied interfering, and Trump has repeatedly said there was no collusion between his campaign and Moscow, slamming the Mueller probe as a “witch hunt.”

“I didn’t speak to Matt Whitaker about it,” Trump said of the probe, adding he did not rule out sitting down for an interview with Mueller. “I haven’t ruled out anything,” he said. “I haven’t even thought about it.”

© 2018 Thomson Reuters

Report an error

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.

Global News