Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.

Liberals hint at more defence spending in upcoming budget as U.S. demands more

WATCH: Liberal MP John McKay and Conservative Garnett Genuis join Vassy Kapelos to discuss why Canada is not spending 2% GDP on defence spending in a world with increasing global security challenges – Feb 19, 2017

The Canadian military could see a boost in their budget, the Liberals are hinting, days after the United States threatened to pull back on its NATO commitments if other countries don’t pony up.

Story continues below advertisement

“We’ll have to see in the budget, but I have some confidence that the voices of those who want to see more of Canada and want to see us more involved militarily are actually going to be respected,” said parliamentary secretary for defence John McKay.

READ MORE: Justin Trudeau, Angela Merkel differ on NATO spending

As part of its NATO commitment, Canada is supposed to spend two per cent of gross domestic product on defence – but it’s been almost 30 years since the government last hit that threshold.

Canada currently spends 0.99 per cent of GDP on defence.

WATCH: Justin Trudeau says Canada contributes to NATO with more than just money

The budget for National Defence, currently at almost $19 billion, increases by about $600 million annually. But McKay suggested the increase would go above and beyond the built-in increase, though the Liberals, with deficits projecting well beyond what they’d campaigned on, find themselves with little money to play around with.

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: Donald Trump discusses NATO, migrants with Italian PM

The daily email you need for 's top news stories.

“I do agree the world needs more of Canada,” he said. “We obviously have fiscal challenges. The economy is a bit flat lined and your entire budget depends on GDP growth, so there will be challenges.”

Saskatchewan Conservative MP Garnett Genuis said the government has little choice but to increase spending, given the rhetoric coming from the States.

WATCH: U.S. defence secretary reaffirms U.S. commitment to NATO

“For global peace and security, having a strong NATO alliance is critical,” he said. “So when we have the Americans communicating this message that basically they’re going to pull back on their commitments if other countries don’t step up to follow through on their commitments, we need to take that very seriously.”

Story continues below advertisement

WATCH: NATO calls out Canada, Europe for defence spending shortfalls

U.S. President Donald Trump has called the 28-country NATO alliance obsolete, while U.S. Defense Secretary James Mattis delivered an ultimatum of sorts this week, saying the U.S. expects its allies (only a handful of which have met the two percent of GDP spending threshold) to start spending more on defence or else it will “moderate its commitment.”

Trump, however, is far from the first U.S. president to lean on its NATO allies.

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: NATO is obsolete, Trump says, but still ‘very important to me’

During a June 2016 speech to Parliament in Ottawa, U.S. President Barack Obama softened his request of Canada by saying he wanted to see more Canada in NATO.

Prior to that, the Canadian ambassadors for former president George W. Bush were far more blunt in calling on Canada to pull its weight on defence.

During a news conference in Berlin last week, Prime Minister Justin Trudeau said Canada’s commitment to NATO is demonstrated in ways other than spending; Canada regularly steps up, delivers troops and participates in missions, he said.

READ MORE: Trudeau touts merits of EU free trade pact, warns CETA could be last deal of its kind

But long-term, it will be difficult for Canada to maintain its capabilities without increasing investments, Genuis said.

Story continues below advertisement
“The security of [the NATO] alliance and the willingness of al memebers to invest is critical for peace and stability in the world,” he said. “The current escalator is nowhere near getting us to meet our commitment, so I think what we need to see is a long term plan for getting us to two per cent.”

With files from The Canadian Press

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article