Advertisement

Donald Trump used ‘legally dubious’ tax avoidance method: report

WASHINGTON – Donald Trump avoided paying potentially hundreds of millions of dollars in taxes in a way even his own lawyers considered questionable, The New York Times reported Monday.

The newspaper said the maneuver was “legally dubious” and also may explain how Trump posted a one-year loss of more than $900 million a few years later, enabling him to avoid paying federal income taxes for perhaps 18 years.

READ MORE: Donald Trump tax returns: 5 things you need to know on fallout from ‘bombshell’ report

At issue is how Trump was able to cancel hundreds of millions of dollars of debt as his casino empire in Atlantic City went broke in the early 1990s. Cancelled debt generally is treated as taxable income, meaning Trump would have owed the Internal Revenue Service significant money on debt that his creditors forgave.

Story continues below advertisement

The Times said it obtained documents from a quarter-century ago showing Trump essentially traded the debt relief for nearly worthless “partnership equity” to avoid any tax liability. In practice, the strategy was almost identical to a tax maneuver that was already outlawed, but differed in minor details. Trump’s own lawyers advised him the IRS would likely find it improper if he were audited, the paper said, and Congress explicitly outlawed the maneuver in 2004.

WATCH: New York Times report exposes Donald Trump’s possible tax problem 
Click to play video: 'New York Times report exposes Donald Trump’s possible tax problem'
New York Times report exposes Donald Trump’s possible tax problem

Hillary Clinton, then a New York senator, was among the lawmakers who voted to close the loophole.

Financial news and insights delivered to your email every Saturday.

Hope Hicks, Trump’s spokeswoman, told The Times that its reporting “suggests either a fundamental misunderstanding or an intentional misreading of the law.” She said Trump doesn’t think taxpayers “should file returns that resolve all doubt in favour of the IRS.”

 

Advertisement

Sponsored content

AdChoices