Advertisement

Experts say Casey Anthony up against meticulous case from prosecutors, wild defence theory

Attorney Jose Baez and his client Casey Anthony stand as the jury enters to courtroom for Anthony's trial at the Orange County Courthouse on Saturday, June 4, 2011 in Orlando, Fla. Anthony, 25, is charged with murder in the 2008 death of her daughter Caylee. If convicted, she could be sentenced to death. (AP Photo/Red Huber, Pool).
Attorney Jose Baez and his client Casey Anthony stand as the jury enters to courtroom for Anthony's trial at the Orange County Courthouse on Saturday, June 4, 2011 in Orlando, Fla. Anthony, 25, is charged with murder in the 2008 death of her daughter Caylee. If convicted, she could be sentenced to death. (AP Photo/Red Huber, Pool).

ORLANDO, Fla. – Legal experts say prosecutors’ meticulous murder case against Casey Anthony so far, along with the woman’s sensational claims that her father covered up her daughter’s death after the 2-year-old drowned, could make it difficult to avoid a conviction.

Saturday ended the second week of testimony in Anthony’s murder trial, and prosecutors say it also marks roughly the halfway point of their case. Prosecutors are trying to prove that the single mother, then 22, suffocated her daughter Caylee by placing duct tape over the girl’s mouth and then dumped her body in the woods near her parents’ home.

It’s a high-profile case that has demanded a methodical approach from a prosecution team with more than 70 years of combined experience – in part because, if convicted, Anthony could become only the fourth woman added to Florida’s current roster of 397 death row inmates.

Meanwhile, defence attorneys introduced a wild theory during opening statements, saying that the toddler accidently drowned on June 15, 2008, in her grandparents’ swimming pool and that grandfather George Anthony helped dispose of her body. They also claimed he molested Casey when she was a child, leaving her emotionally scarred.

Story continues below advertisement

Even without a clear motive established for why Casey Anthony, now 25, might have killed her daughter, some court watchers said those defence arguments may be overshadowing any deficiencies in the prosecution’s case.

“I believe they have almost relieved the state of their burden of proof by making such strong assertions in opening statements,” said Karin Moore, a professor at Florida A&M University’s College of Law. “They are going to have to prove it now. It is going to be a difficult task for them.”

Caylee was last seen by her grandparents on June 16, 2008. The state contends Anthony waited 31 days before telling her family the toddler was missing. George Anthony denied abusing his daughter and being involved with Caylee’s death on the witness stand, at one point lowering his head and saying, “When I heard that … it hurt really badly.”

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily National news

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

So far, prosecutors have mostly ignored all that, meticulously showing jurors the carefree lifestyle Anthony led during the month her child was believed to be missing, and through the repeated lies she told friends, family and law enforcement. They have also presented evidence that a decomposing body – presumably that of Caylee – was in Casey Anthony’s car. But the bulk of their forensic evidence is still to come, and it’s unclear if it will be enough for a conviction in a highly circumstantial case.

Casey Anthony told detectives she had been trying to find her daughter in the month before the disappearance was reported, but so far prosecutors have shown numerous examples of her going to nightclubs, shopping and hanging out with friends during that time.

Story continues below advertisement

It’s also undisputed by the defence that once law enforcement was notified, Anthony continued to spin a web of lies centred on an imaginary nanny named “Zanny” that she initially said kidnapped her daughter, taking detectives to a vacant apartment where she claimed the woman lived.

One potential problem for prosecutors is that all their witnesses who knew the two have only used words like “loving” and “special” to describe Casey and Caylee’s bond – giving no indication the woman wanted to harm her daughter.

That’s why prosecutors have focused on Anthony’s lies. They even showed more than five hours of recorded jailhouse visits she had with her parents, in which she continued to insist Caylee was kidnapped. The visits occurred after Anthony was jailed on child neglect and criminal obstruction charges and before she was charged with Caylee’s death.

The videos also seem to undercut the defence contention that George Anthony helped cover up his granddaughter’s death, as he appears to not know where she might be and clings to the hope she might be alive.

Kendall Coffey, a former U.S. attorney for the Southern District of Florida in Miami, said things don’t appear to be going well for the defence.

“Given all the question marks about this case and the lack of strong motive evidence for Casey Anthony to kill her own child, there might have been a defence ability to pause at accidental death,” Coffey said. “But what happened is that in the opening, the defence went too far, raised other sensational allegations that they don’t seem to have any sensational evidence to back up.”

Story continues below advertisement

Defence attorney Jose Baez has kept the drowning theory alive, getting lead detective Yuri Melich to admit that Anthony’s mother, Cindy, mentioned seeing the ladder to the family’s above-ground pool up and the gate open in early June.

At the same time, lead prosecutor Linda Drane Burdick and fellow state attorneys Frank George and Jeff Ashton have gotten virtually everyone Casey interacted with in June and July 2008 to say she never mentioned her child wasn’t alive during that time.

In the end, Coffey thinks it might force defence attorneys to do something they don’t want to do.

“They might not have any choice but to put Casey Anthony on the stand,” Coffey said. “And given the clear evidence that she is a compulsive liar, that is the worst kind of choice any defence lawyer would have to make.”

___

Associated Press writers Mike Schneider in Orlando and Tony Winton in Miami contributed to this report.

Sponsored content

AdChoices