Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Comments closed.

Due to the sensitive and/or legal subject matter of some of the content on globalnews.ca, we reserve the ability to disable comments from time to time.

Please see our Commenting Policy for more.

B.C. court turfs conviction of woman accused of coughing at workers during COVID

Specimens to be tested for COVID-19 are seen in Surrey, B.C., on Thursday, March 26, 2020. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Darryl Dyck

The B.C. Supreme Court has thrown out a conviction handed down to a woman accused of yelling and coughing at grocery store workers in Campbell River early in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Story continues below advertisement

Kimberly Woolman was originally convicted of causing a disturbance by shouting and assault and handed a sentence of 18 months’ probation.

The incident happened on April 24, 2020, and was captured on video.

According to the ruling by Justice Douglas Thompson, Woolman was “complaining with considerable persistence and vigour” about the store enforcing COVID safety protocols.

The daily email you need for BC's top news stories.

At trial, the judge found that in the course of the incident, she shouted at and disturbed employees and customers and that she assaulted one worker by intentionally coughing in their direction and assaulted another by pushing her shopping cart into him.

Story continues below advertisement

At trial, however, the lower court judge also ruled that Woolman could not call a character witness, finding that the evidence would be irrelevant since Woolman’s identity wasn’t in question in the incident.

Woolman subsequently opted not to testify or call other evidence in the trial.

Thompson ruled this was “not a harmless or minor” error, as a character witness could have altered the court’s perception on whether Woolman was actually shouting or whether she intentionally applied force.

Story continues below advertisement

This type of error would typically result in a case being sent back for trial, as there could still be a reasonable possibility of conviction with the additional evidence, Thompson noted.

However, he noted that Thompson had already served about a third of her probation order and exercised his discretion to dismiss the convictions and enter an acquittal instead.

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article