Advertisement

Rosemary Thomson files lawsuit against Okanagan Symphony Society, president

Click to play video: 'Okanagan conductor to take legal action'
Okanagan conductor to take legal action
It's been two weeks since the music director of the Okanagan Symphony Orchestra was relieved of her duties and now Rosemary Thompson is taking legal action in hopes of being reinstated. Sydney Morton has the story. – Dec 13, 2023

Rosemary Thomson got kicked out of the Okanagan Symphony Orchestra — according to legal documents — because of a conflict that arose during a concert about decolonization.

Thomson, the orchestra’s former conductor and music director, is suing the Okanagan Symphony Society and its president, Judy Burns, over her firing.

A concert called “Amplify” was about “showing leadership in the development and decolonization of the Okanagan Symphony Society’s artform and developing strategies to engage new and diverse audiences,” the lawsuit says.

Although the concert was focused on inclusion and race relations, the lawsuit mostly centres around the execution of logistics during the event in Kelowna on Nov. 18, and an alleged contentious professional relationship between Thomson and Burns.

Click to play video: 'Internet sleuths solve music mystery involving B.C. woman'
Internet sleuths solve music mystery involving B.C. woman

Thomson was fired after getting blamed for the show starting late, arriving late to the rehearsals, and because other things weren’t ready on time, according to the lawsuit.

Story continues below advertisement

The society cited “poor preparation and time management” by Thomson.

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.

Get breaking National news

For news impacting Canada and around the world, sign up for breaking news alerts delivered directly to you when they happen.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Thomson argued that the delays were not the result of unprofessionalism and offered an explanation for each of them.

Her lawsuit alleges the Okanagan Symphony Society did not act in good faith, and breached its duties by failing to provide administrative support, clear direction or any warnings.

Burns did not act in good faith by presenting inaccurate or incomplete information to the board about Thomson, soliciting negative feedback about her during exit interviews, and seeking legal advice that would recommend against renewing her contract.

The lawsuit alleges Burns has an “animus” against Thomson and sought to discredit the conductor in their “small and close-knit” professional community.

Click to play video: 'Little Mountain, Big Sound'
Little Mountain, Big Sound

The lawsuit claims Burns told the board that Thomson was the primary cause of their financial difficulties, and was “an impediment to change that the Society and OSO needed to undergo.”

Story continues below advertisement

The claim also says Burns lied by telling board members the conductor agreed to a longer COVID-era paycut than what was agreed upon.

Board members were told by Burns that Thomson’s issues were not a result of her ADHD, but rather because of personal failings.

Shortly after the announcement on Dec. 6 that Thomson was fired, Burns responded on behalf of the OSO.

“I can assure our community that the release of Rosemary Thomson from her contract was done after a thorough examination of the available information,” reads part of Burns’ statement to the media.

Thomson said the statement was false and malicious, and that her character, credit and reputation were seriously injured.

Click to play video: 'Favorite traditional Christmas songs with music expert Eric Alper'
Favorite traditional Christmas songs with music expert Eric Alper

The ordeal caused her anxiety, humiliation, and embarrassment. And she was fired in bad faith.

Story continues below advertisement

Thomson would have been paid $6,680 per month for the nine remaining months of her contract — a total of $60,120 — however the lawsuit does not specify an exact amount in the relief sought.

The OSO has yet to respond to the lawsuit and none of these allegations have been proven in court.

Sponsored content

AdChoices