Advertisement

Defense admits Tsarnaev carried out Boston Marathon bombing

WATCH ABOVE: Dzhokhar Tsarnaev has admitted he role in the deadly 2013 Boston Marathon bombing, but has pleaded not guilty to 30 charges. As Aarti Pole reports, he could be sentenced to death if he’s convicted.

BOSTON – The question, for all practical purposes, is no longer whether Dzhokhar Tsarnaev took part in the Boston Marathon bombing. It’s whether he deserves to die for it.

In a startling opening statement at the nation’s biggest terrorism trial in nearly 20 years, Tsarnaev’s own lawyer told a jury that the 21-year-old former college student committed the crime.

“It WAS him,” said defence attorney Judy Clarke, one of the nation’s foremost death-penalty specialists.

But in a strategy aimed at saving Tsarnaev from a death sentence, she argued that he had fallen under the malevolent influence of his now-dead older brother, Tamerlan.

Story continues below advertisement

“The evidence will not establish and we will not argue that Tamerlan put a gun to Dzhokhar’s head or that he forced him to join in the plan,” Clarke said, “but you will hear evidence about the kind of influence that this older brother had.”

READ MORE: Victims to relive horror of Boston Marathon bombing as trial begins

Three people were killed and more than 260 hurt when two shrapnel-packed pressure-cooker bombs exploded near the finish line on April 15, 2013. Tsarnaev, then 19, was accused of carrying out the attacks with 26-year-old Tamerlan, who was killed in a shootout and getaway attempt days later.

Prosecutors contend the brothers – ethnic Chechens who arrived from Russia more than a decade ago – were driven by anger over U.S. wars in Muslim lands.

Federal prosecutors used their opening statements – along with heartbreaking testimony and grisly video – to sketch a picture of torn limbs, screams and the smell of sulfur and burned hair in the streets and to paint Tsarnaev as a cold-blooded killer.

Tsarnaev planted a bomb designed to “tear people apart and create a bloody spectacle,” then hung out with his college buddies as if he didn’t have a care in the world, federal prosecutor William Weinreb said.

“He believed that he was a soldier in a holy war against Americans,” Weinreb said. “He also believed that by winning that victory, he had taken a step toward reaching paradise.”

Story continues below advertisement

Among the first witnesses for the prosecution were victims who lost limbs in the attack, including Rebekah Gregory, who walked slowly to the stand on her artificial left leg.

“I remember being thrown back, hoisted into the air,” said Gregory, who had gone to watch the marathon with her 5-year-old son, Noah. “My first instinct as a mother was, where in the world was my baby, where was my son?”

Breaking news from Canada and around the world sent to your email, as it happens.

She said she looked down at her leg: “My bones were literally laying next to me on the sidewalk and blood was everywhere.” She said she saw other peoples’ body parts all around her, and “at that point, I thought that was the day I would die.”

“I could hear Noah, I don’t know how, but I could hear my little boy.” He was saying, “Mommy, Mommy, Mommy, over and over again,” she recalled. “I said a prayer. I said, ‘God, if this is it, take me, but let me know that Noah is OK.”‘

READ MORE: Civil rights group to sue FBI over death of man tied to Boston Marathon suspect

She said someone finally picked up her son and put him down beside her. Breaking down in tears, she testified that as she looked for the boy, she saw a woman lying dead on the pavement.

A shaggy-haired, goateed Tsarnaev slouched in his seat and showed little reaction as the case unfolded. Apart from a question or two, the defence did not cross-examine the first few prosecution witnesses.

Story continues below advertisement

About two dozen victims, including Heather Abbott, who also lost a leg in the attack, took up one entire side the courtroom, listening somberly to details of the carnage. Several hung their heads and appeared to fight back tears.

Prosecutors also showed the jury a gruesome video of the moments after the first bomb exploded. People could be seen lying in pools of blood, others bending over to help them.

The footage was punctuated by screams, moans and the crying of a boy. The ground was strewn with ball bearings and chunks of metal litter, and smoke wafted over the victims.

Members of the jury watched somberly. Several grimaced, especially at the sight of a gaping hole in a woman’s leg.

Another witness, Sean O’Hara, manager of a sporting goods store near where the bomb blew up, choked back tears as he described smelling burned hair and seeing wounded people streaming into the shop.

He and other employees ripped clothing from the racks for use as tourniquets and rushed outside to help.

“I heard a voice of someone saying, ‘Stay with me, stay with me,”‘ O’Hara said, his voice cracking.

The prosecutor also described how 8-year-old Martin Richard stood on a metal barrier with other children so he could get a good view of the runners.

Story continues below advertisement

“The bomb tore large chunks of flesh out of Martin Richard,” and the boy bled to death on the sidewalk as his mother looked on helplessly, Weinreb told the jury, with the youngster’s parents in the courtroom.

Because of a wealth of evidence against Tsarnaev – including a video of him leaving a backpack at the scene, and incriminating graffiti scrawled on the boat where he was captured – legal experts have said there is little chance of escaping conviction during the guilt-or-innocence phase of the trial.

Instead, they said, Tsarnaev’s lawyers will concentrate on saving his life by arguing that the radicalized Tamerlan was the driving force in the plot.

Clarke, in an opening statement that took less than 20 minutes, called the bombings “senseless, horribly misguided acts.” But she asked the jurors to “hold your hearts and minds open” until the penalty phase, when the panel will decide whether Tsarnaev should be executed or get life in prison.

She held up two enlarged photos – one showing the two brothers years before the bombings, the other showing them carrying the backpacks containing the explosives – and asked the jury to contemplate: “What took Dzhokhar Tsarnaev from this … to this?”

While the outcome of the guilt-or-innocence phase of the trial is now probably a foregone conclusion, that doesn’t mean it is an empty exercise.

Story continues below advertisement

Robert Bloom, a Boston College law professor and former prosecutor, said the defence will use this phase to build the case that Tsarnaev was a follower, not a mastermind.

“They’ll want to use every opportunity they can to show he was influenced by his brother,” Bloom said. “Who bought the pressure cookers? Who bought the BBs? All of that.”

Prosecutors, for their part, will use this stage to get across the horror of the attack and prime the jury to come back with a death sentence later, Bloom said.

Right up until the moment the jury filed into the courtroom, Tsarnaev’s lawyers fought to have the trial moved out of Massachusetts, arguing that the emotional impact of the bombings ran too deep and too many people had personal connections to the case. But U.S. District Judge George O’Toole Jr. and a federal appeals court rejected the requests.

The panel of 10 women and eight men was chosen Tuesday after two long months of jury selection, interrupted repeatedly by snowstorms and the requests to move the trial, which is expected to last three to four months.

The case is the most closely watched terrorism trial in the U.S. since the Oklahoma City bombing case in the mid-1990s.

Clarke has saved a string of high-profile clients from the death penalty, including Atlanta Olympics bomber Eric Rudolph; Unabomber Ted Kaczynski; and Jared Loughner, who killed six people and gravely wounded then-Rep. Gabrielle Giffords in a 2011 shooting in Tucson, Arizona.

Advertisement

Sponsored content

AdChoices