Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Comments closed.

Due to the sensitive and/or legal subject matter of some of the content on globalnews.ca, we reserve the ability to disable comments from time to time.

Please see our Commenting Policy for more.

Vancouver Canucks owner Francesco Aquilini and ex-wife back in family court

WATCH: Vancouver Canucks owner Francesco Aquilini is opening up about the big changes announced over the weekend for the top leadership team, including the firing of the team’s head coach Travis Green and general manager Jim Benning. Squire Barnes reports – Dec 6, 2021

The divorce case of Francesco Aquilini and his ex-wife Taliah is back in family court.

Story continues below advertisement

Taliah Aquilini’s lawyer says she is in court allegedly to enforce child support for their adult children who are enrolled in university.

In a statement to Global News, Claire Hunter says “each of the four children and Ms. Aquilini have filed affidavit evidence in court, some of which was read out in the course of the hearing (Tuesday). Mr. Aquilini  has been in possession of all the affidavits for many months and, as I mentioned in court, he has not given any evidence denying any of that affidavit evidence.”

Gary Ross, a public relations representative for the Canucks’ owner responded by saying, “Francesco Aquilini categorically denies and is outraged by the accusation made by his ex-wife Taliah in family court (Tuesday) that he has ever abused his children.

“The couple were divorced and reached a settlement in 2013. Mr. Aquilini has met and will continue to meet any child support obligations required by the law, but he has concerns about the veracity of the information provided in support of financial demands.

Story continues below advertisement

“It is unfortunate that allegations without merit are brought forward for a collateral purpose. He will have nothing further to say at this time as the matter is before the courts.”

The Vancouver Canucks organization said it does not have a comment as this is a “personal family matter.”

Both parties have refused further comment while the case is before the courts.

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article