Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Comments closed.

Due to the sensitive and/or legal subject matter of some of the content on globalnews.ca, we reserve the ability to disable comments from time to time.

Please see our Commenting Policy for more.

B.C. man suing RCMP officers after Salmon Arm car wash shooting in 2017

A photo showing two RCMP vehicles and the plaintiff’s truck following a police shooting at a Salmon Arm car wash in 2017. IIO of BC

A B.C. man who was observed breaking into a car wash coin booth and was later shot by police is suing three RCMP officers for excessive force.

Story continues below advertisement

According to court documents, the incident occurred in Salmon Arm, at XCalibur Car Wash along the Trans-Canada Highway, on Jan. 30, 2017, just after 12 a.m.

The lawsuit, filed in Kamloops, says police shot at the plaintiff’s truck 14 times, which a report from the Independent Investigations Office of B.C. confirmed.

As of a result of being shot, the plaintiff, Kaymen Wesley Winter, is said to have sustained a variety of injuries, including bone and metal fragments penetrating five centimetres into his brain.

The lawsuit also listed the Attorney General of Canada and the Province of B.C. as defendants.

The shooting happened as Winter tried to exit the car wash in his ‘lifted’ Chevy Silverado. A photo shows a police vehicle blocking the exit path, with a second off to the truck’s passenger side and a third blocking the car wash entrance.

Story continues below advertisement
The Independent Investigations Office of B.C. said it did not consider forwarding any possible charges against the officers , stating, “Had [Winter] not attempted to flee he would not have been injured. Officer 1’s reaction was to a situation that was not his creation and does not constitute an offence.”

The lawsuit says Winter resides in Surrey, though his truck at the time had Alberta licence plates.

It also says the officer used excessive force in shooting him; that the RCMP failed to properly train the officer in the reasonable use of force; and that the officer fired on him “notwithstanding that there was no threat of death or serious bodily harm to anyone present.”

In its report, the IIO of B.C. said the car wash owner saw Winter trying to access the coin box via closed-circuit television. The owner then called 911.

Story continues below advertisement

The car wash features automatic entrance doors, but manually operated exit doors.

“The car wash owner said [Winter] stopped, got out of his truck, activated the door and returned to his truck, and began to drive out of the car wash bay,” said the report.

While he was doing so, the three police vehicles arrived: one officer at the entrance, one at the exit and the third, off to the truck’s passenger side. It was that officer who wound up firing the shots.

“The car wash owner said [Winter] stopped, got out of his truck, activated the door and returned to his truck, and began to drive out of the car wash bay,” said the report.
“[The exit-blocking officer] turned on his police lights and left his vehicle. He started walking towards the man-door at or near the same time as [Winter] pushed the button to open the bay door. As the bay door was opening, [Winter] returned to his truck.”
Story continues below advertisement
The report added that “[Winter] told IIO investigators that because he was aware he had outstanding warrants for his arrest his reaction was to flee when the police pulled in front and back of the car wash bay.”

The report said Winter’s “intentions were to … drive around the … cop. Because there was — like how he parked he parked at an angle and so there was just enough room for me to go around …”

The officers told the IIO they believed that the truck was trying to run over the blocking officer.

The report later said “Officer 1 had to make a split second decision about what, in his mind, was needed to protect Officer 3 from being run over and possibly killed. In that situation, the law did not require Officer 1 to first carefully calculate how much force was needed. If he took that time, Officer 3 may have been killed.”

The lawsuit is seeking relief for general damages, special damages, exemplary damages, punitive damages, constitutional damages for breaching the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms; costs and interest.

Story continues below advertisement

None of the allegations have been proven in court.

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article