Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Comments closed.

Due to the sensitive and/or legal subject matter of some of the content on globalnews.ca, we reserve the ability to disable comments from time to time.

Please see our Commenting Policy for more.

Man acquitted of killing Candace Derksen suing police, Crown attorneys, city

Mark Grant on the first day of his 2017 retrial for Candace Derksen's death. File

The man acquitted of tying up and leaving Candace Derksen to freeze to death in a shed in 1984 is suing the prosecutors and officers behind his arrest, as well as the City and Province.

Story continues below advertisement

In a statement of claim filed Wednesday, Mark Grant names several crown attorneys and police officers, the City of Winnipeg and the Province of Manitoba.

He is seeking damages totaling $8.5 million.

The lawsuit claims the Government of Manitoba as well as the City of Winnipeg are “jointly and severally [sic] vicariously liable for the tortious conduct” of their employees in the case.

It also claims the police and crown attorneys are liable for “malicious prosecution.”

Grant’s lawyer, Lawrence Greenspon of Greenspon, Granger and Hill, said the amount of damages is “just a number.

“There is no form of compensation that will make up for that, the impact it’s had on his life.”

Story continues below advertisement

Grant, 55, was acquitted in October of 2017 in connection to the young girl’s death. He had spent 10 years in prison when he was first arrested in 2007.

“I am not satisfied…that the crown has proven Mr. Grant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt,” Judge Karen Simonsen said in court at the time.

The daily email you need for 's top news stories.

In Simonsen’s 130 page written decision, she placed a focus on the DNA evidence linking Grant to Derksen’s death, calling the data and conclusions of the evidence “seriously flawed.”

While he was convicted in 2011, Grant was ordered a new trial partly due to the basis of DNA, and because he was not allowed to present evidence of a possible alternative suspect.

Story continues below advertisement

During the retrial, Grant’s lawyer, Saul Simmonds, challenged the validity of DNA evidence the police used to connect Grant to Derksen’s death. He said the DNA tests on twine gathered at the murder scene in 1985 were flawed and contaminated and there is none left that can be re-tested.

The lawsuit alleges the lab behind the DNA testing, Molecular World, engaged in “purposeful or negligent tampering of evidence.”

The people named in the civil lawsuit include prosecutors Brent Davidson, Michael Himmelman, Cynthia Devine, Amiram Kotler, Brian Bell and Rekha Malaviya.

Police officers Al Bradbury, Jon Lutz, Ronald Allan, along with former police chief Jack Ewatski, are also named.

A provincial spokesperson said the Province has yet to be formally served, and would not comment because it is “an ongoing matter before the courts.”

Story continues below advertisement

In 2017, Grant’s defence lawyer Saul Simmonds said he has advised his client to see if he has grounds for a suit.

“I’m certainly having him consult with civil counsel,” Simmonds told Global News.

“A lawsuit like that would be an uphill battle. A steep uphill battle,” defence lawyer Jay Prober said.

However, Prober said spending ten years behind bars for a crime you are acquitted of would also be very damaging to a person.

Greenspon agreed.

“Grant has struggled to find employment since he was acquitted, he said, noting Grant suffers from a learning disability, and the 10 years he spent in prison had a “significant” impact on his client’s mental health.

“[This case is] going to be a challenge, these cases always are, but we’re hopeful justice will prevail a second time for Mark Grant.”

Story continues below advertisement

-With files from Brittany Greenslade and Katie Dangerfield

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article