Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.

Advocate blasts government’s challenge of court ruling on First Nations child services

WATCH: Cindy Blackstock says she's 'flabbergasted' at the government's appeal of compensation for First Nations children – Oct 4, 2019

The federal government‘s decision to challenge a landmark court ruling promising billions to First Nations children and families has left one advocate vowing to continue the fight.

Story continues below advertisement

“We’re not going to just let Canada run roughshod over these children’s lives,” said Cindy Blackstock, executive director of the First Nations Child and Family Caring Society, one of the groups behind the Canadian Human Rights Tribunal complaint.

In a ruling last month, the tribunal found that the federal government “willfully and recklessly” discriminated against children living on reserves by not properly funding child and family services. It set compensation at the maximum possible, $40,000, for those affected and their family members – meaning an overall payout in the billions.

READ MORE: Indigenous families given $2B payout for children separated from parents by government

The federal government’s lawyers filed an application seeking a judicial review of the tribunal’s decision on Friday, which left Blackstock flabbergasted.

Story continues below advertisement

“I just think if my organization was found to be willfully, recklessly discriminating against little kids in ways that contribute to their deaths and their family separations, my first reaction wouldn’t be to appeal the decision,” she said. “My first reaction would be to move heaven and earth to make sure it’s not continuing and to make sure that I made proper reparations to those families in whatever way I could.”

The government wants the tribunal’s ruling to be set aside and the claim for monetary compensation to be dismissed. Alternatively, it wants the ruling set aside, or stayed, and the case referred back to the tribunal, or any other relief from the decision the court deems appropriate.

Story continues below advertisement

In order for a stay pending judicial review to be granted, there’s a three-part legal test, a filing from the Attorney General explains.

One of the criteria is whether the party seeking the stay would suffer “irreparable harm” if it was refused.

The Attorney General argued this was the case, saying that proceeding with the compensation process could result in “unrecoverable” losses for the government if the judicial review found there were problems with the tribunal’s ruling.

“They say that there is irreparable harm to Canada to pay this compensation, and to put this in perspective, the money the tribunal awarded to the children for the damages done to them is less than one per cent of Canada’s budget,” said Blackstock.

Story continues below advertisement

“So I don’t know how they’re arguing that.”

Both Justin Trudeau and Indigenous Services Minister Seamus O’Regan told reporters they agree with the tribunal’s finding that there must be compensation for those who were harmed, but said further consultation is needed in order to get it right.

“Those are conversations that we cannot have during a writ period,” Trudeau said.​

Story continues below advertisement

Blackstock said the government claiming it’s not against compensation amounts to “misinformation” in her view.

READ MORE: Residential schools subjected students to disease, abuse, experiments, TRC report says

The application for judicial review states that “Canada acknowledges the finding of systemic discrimination and does not oppose the general principle that compensation to First Nations individuals affected by a discriminatory funding model can be made in appropriate circumstances.”

“Awarding compensation to individuals in this claim, however, was inconsistent with the nature of the complaint, the evidence, past jurisprudence and the Canadian Human Rights Act.”

Both Green Leader Elizabeth May and NDP Leader Jagmeet Singh have condemned the Liberals’ decision to appeal the ruling. Conservative Leader Andrew Scheer has said a Tory government would ask for a judicial review.

Story continues below advertisement

–With files from the Canadian Press and Global News

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article