Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.

TransLink to move forward with Surrey SkyTrain extension, but getting to Langley remains in limbo

TransLink's Mayors' Council has approved moving ahead with the Surrey SkyTrain extension. TransLink

The TransLink Mayors’ Council has officially approved moving forward with extending SkyTrain service through Surrey — despite not having the money to get to Langley.

Story continues below advertisement

The mayors agreed to proceed with the extension using just the current funding of $1.6 billion, which only gets the track to Fleetwood near 166 Street and builds three other stops in between.

This decision means TransLink staff can move forward to work on the business case, which will ask senior levels of government to cover the remaining cost of getting to Langley.

WATCH: (Aired July 19) Surrey-Langley SkyTrain extension would cost significantly more than funding

That business case is set to be delivered by mid-2020.

Story continues below advertisement

“I think with huge public support, the ridership figures are good, the cost-benefit is good,” said Surrey Mayor Doug McCallum. “I think this project needs to go forward as soon as possible.”

Building the SkyTrain all the way out to the City of Langley — a project McCallum partly based his candidacy for mayor on — is slated to cost $3.12 billion, which has not been secured.

That bill almost matches the cost of the now-scrapped 27-kilometre Surrey LRT, but will only build 16.5 kilometres of SkyTrain track.

Some mayors, particularly those on the North Shore, objected to moving ahead with a project that will require more funding to complete.

But Mayors’ Council chair and New Westminster Mayor Jonathan Cote said the project is still an important one to move ahead with.

Story continues below advertisement

WATCH: (Aired July 19) Group proposes alternative to Surrey-to-Langley LRT SkyTrain option

“I recognize this is a difficult decision and if approved, will be steering us further down this direction” towards more SkyTrain infrastructure south of the Fraser, Cote said ahead of the vote.

Following the vote, the Mayors’ Council said in a statement it is confident funding can be fully secured from the provincial and federal governments.

Story continues below advertisement

“It’s very exciting to see the plan moving into action,” Langley City Mayor Val van den Broek said in the statement. “This project is a key part of the 10-Year Vision and will deliver the rapid transit residents have been calling for.”

Township of Langley Mayor Jack Froese added the combined population of Surrey and Langley is expected to rise by 280,000 people by 2035, making the extension crucial to the region.

“We must be ready, or we will be stuck in congestion that hurts our economy and the quality of life of our residents,” he said.

TransLink estimates the full extension to Langley will serve 62,000 riders daily by 2035.

McCallum claimed those ridership projections are a low estimate, citing upcoming developments in the region that he said will boost ridership even higher.

Story continues below advertisement

Vancouver Mayor Kennedy Stewart, who has become McCallum’s chief ally in fighting for the Surrey SkyTrain extension, was unable to attend the meeting.

That led to speculation the vote may end up shifting away from McCallum’s favour, which ended up being unfounded.

In a statement, Surrey Board of Trade CEO Anita Huberman said only building the SkyTrain extension to Fleetwood will compromise transit in Surrey overall.

Huberman also gave a presentation to the Mayors’ Council arguing switching from LRT was a mistake.

“The Surrey Board of Trade supported LRT because it would be the most effective means by which to connect the town centres, making transit within Surrey the objective, making Surrey the destination,” the CEO said in the statement.

Story continues below advertisement

“We could have had shovels in the ground right now helping to connect our town centres as a start.”

—With files from Janet Brown and Simon Little

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article