March 8, 2019 3:53 pm

Jocelyne Lizotte’s sons tell court killing of their ailing mother was no act of compassion

Michel Cadotte, accused of murder in the 2017 death of his ailing wife in what has been described as a mercy killing, arrives for his sentencing hearing at the courthouse Friday, March 8, 2019 in Montreal.

Ryan Remiorz/The Canadian Press
A A

Michel Cadotte’s decision to end the life of his ailing wife was an act of selfishness rather than compassion, the victim’s sons told a sentencing hearing Friday.

A jury found Cadotte, 57, guilty of manslaughter Feb. 23 in the suffocation death of his 60-year-old wife, Jocelyne Lizotte, at a long-term care facility.

READ MORE: Montreal man Michel Cadotte guilty of manslaughter in death of ailing wife

Story continues below

Several people in the courtroom, including the judge, cried as family members described the impact of Lizotte’s illness and death on her loved ones.

Lizotte’s son Danick Desautels said he lost his mother three times: once when his father died and she grew distant, once when she was diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease and finally when Cadotte ended her life.

“Despite everything you did for my mother before, for me you’ll remain the one who prevented her from having a gentle, peaceful and natural death, therefore her murderer,” he said, reading from a letter directed at Cadotte.

READ MORE: Crown outlines case against Quebec man charged with suffocating ailing wife

Defence lawyers argued their client was in a disturbed state of mind and acted impulsively on Feb. 20, 2017, seeking to end the suffering of his wife of 19 years.

The crime had been framed in the media as a compassion killing — an offence that doesn’t exist in the Criminal Code. The trial, which began Jan. 14, heard that Cadotte had inquired about a medically assisted death for Lizotte a year before she was killed.

WATCH: Recognizing the signs and symptoms of Alzheimer’s and dementia

But Desautels told the court he believes Cadotte acted in his own interest, to end his suffering rather than Lizotte’s.

“I could have gotten past all that had you committed the act out of compassion, for my mother, to free her, but I know very well you did it for you, to free yourself,” he said.

“In your head, my mother was yours, she belonged to you.”

Lizotte’s other son, David Desautels, said he has had to mourn two losses — his mother and Cadotte, whom he described as “the only father I had for the passage to my adult life.”

David Desautels said Cadotte taught him to cook, sat by his side as he woke from surgery and made his mother happy. He said those pleasant memories are now “tainted by the indelible image that I have of him holding a pillow against my claustrophobic mother to suffocate her,” he said.

He agreed with his brother that Cadotte had acted to end “his own suffering, his conviction that my mother was suffering.”

‘I hoped she wouldn’t live like that for a long time’

Several family members described their feelings of helplessness and guilt at seeing Lizotte’s condition deteriorate to the point that she could no longer take care of herself or recognize loved ones.

Testifying for the defence, Lizotte’s sister described her anguish at seeing her claustrophobic sister having to be constantly strapped to a bed or chair, and admitted she herself had hoped for her sister’s death.

READ MORE: Trial begins for Quebec man charged with killing wife suffering from Alzheimer’s

“I hoped the good Lord would come get her,” Johanne Lizotte said. “I hoped she wouldn’t live like that for a long time.”

Lizotte said that while she doesn’t accept Cadotte’s act, she understands it.

“I understand that it happened in a moment of hopelessness,” she said.

There is no minimum sentence for manslaughter, except in cases when a firearm was used.

Quebec Superior Court Justice Helene Di Salvo, who wiped away tears at the end of the testimony by family members called by the Crown, acknowledged the process was an emotional one.

WATCH: Raising awareness for those living with Alzheimer’s

She warned the family her decision was unlikely to achieve unanimity but promised to weigh the impact of the crime on them in determining a sentence.

The hearing is set to continue Friday afternoon.

© 2019 The Canadian Press

Report an error

Comments

Comments closed.

Due to the sensitive and/or legal subject matter of some of the content on globalnews.ca, we reserve the ability to disable comments from time to time.

Please see our Commenting Policy for more.