Advertisement

Woman displaced by Mississauga house explosion claims water heater company took advantage

Click to play video: 'Mississauga woman displaced by house explosion says water heater company taking'
Mississauga woman displaced by house explosion says water heater company taking
WATCH ABOVE: Mississauga woman displaced by house explosion says water heater company took advantage of her – Sep 29, 2016

The owners of about three-dozen homes in Mississauga’s Dixie and Rathburn Road area remain displaced from their homes due to damage sustained in the Mississauga house explosion over the summer.

Many of those properties aren’t expected to be habitable until next summer.

Among those displaced owners is Barbara Castleberry, who lives in a townhouse right behind the destroyed home, located at 4201 Hickory Dr.

READ MORE: Mississauga house explosion lot for sale, but no mention of deadly blast in listing

Her insurance won’t cover all of the tens of thousands of dollars worth of damage to her home, so she’s choosing her expenses carefully these days.

All the more reason why the latest big bill to show up in the mail at her temporary home is so distressing.

Story continues below advertisement

“Terminated contract charge, drain disconnect fee, taxes,” she reads aloud from a bill sent to her by Reliance Home Comfort. “Totalling $2,164.87.”

Due to safety concerns after the June explosion, Mississauga fire officials ordered Castleberry to have the hot water heater removed from her home.

READ MORE: Mississauga house explosion: Investigators identify second body pulled from rubble

It was Reliance staff that drained and removed the tank for her, and she said they assured her there would be no charge.

But when Castelberry called to confirm that information, she was shocked by the reply.

“I basically was told I still have to pay [rental fees] until my contract runs out, which is a little bit over three years,” she said.

“And because they removed it I was told that’s equivalent to breaking the contract … That’s basically charging you for something that you really are no part of. It’s almost like double victimization.”

Story continues below advertisement

 

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.

Get daily National news

Get the day's top news, political, economic, and current affairs headlines, delivered to your inbox once a day.
By providing your email address, you have read and agree to Global News' Terms and Conditions and Privacy Policy.

Castleberry says many of her neighbours were able to strike deals with their respective providers to put their water heater contracts on hold and continue under the same terms once they were able to move back into their homes.

She says all she was looking for from Reliance was a similar arrangement.

Story continues below advertisement

Reliance has been accused of aggressive tactics in the past.

In 2014, the company reached a consent agreement with the federal Compeititon Bureau on allegations of “anti-competitive water heater return policies.”

READ MORE: Mysterious notes found at Mississauga house explosion scene may lead to cause: police

While a statement at the time pointed out that “Reliance does not admit or accept the allegations, facts, liability or wrongdoing put forth,” the company was fined $5 million by the Bureau and agreed to change its practices.

In an interview Wednesday afternoon, the company’s Greater Toronto Area General Manager Paul Gyamarti told Global News he was investigating the matter.

“It doesn’t sound like it was the customer experience we strive to provide,” he said. “So we’re going to make it right.”

Gyamarti wouldn’t elaborate as to exactly what they would do for Castleberry, though.

WATCH: A walkthrough of the site of the Mississauga house explosion

Click to play video: 'A walkthrough of the site of the Mississauga house explosion'
A walkthrough of the site of the Mississauga house explosion

“I can’t speculate on what the actual outcome of the investigation is going to be,” he said. “But … I feel really comfortable that we’re going to come to a resolution with the customer that they are satisfied with.”

Story continues below advertisement

While Gyamarti wouldn’t confirm it, Castleberry told Global News in a text message Wednesday afternoon that Gyamarti had assured her “he will look into it and call me later this week and see what the company can do. In the meantime, I won’t be charged for rental.”

While some uncertainty still lingers, Castleberry feels the situation is finally moving in the right direction.

“I’m not out of the woods yet,” she said. “But going somewhere.”

Sponsored content

AdChoices