The fees most Canadian banks charge their customers are hard to see or anticipate, and the associated costs can add up quickly over time, a new report says.
The Financial Consumer Agency of Canada, a federal watchdog, released a report Friday which reviewed how Canadian banking fees are structured, disclosed and experienced by consumers. It was conducted on request by the federal government in Budget 2025.
The report examined some of the most common fees consumers see, including for deposit accounts and related banking services.
It found there is a general lack of transparency in some of the ways banks charge their customers, which are often complex and leave little wiggle room for consumers that may grapple with the costs.
“Canadians should be able to clearly understand what they are paying for banking services,” said Shereen Benzvy Miller, commissioner of the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada in a release.
“When fees make the full cost harder to see, it affects both affordability and competition.”
To help avoid confusion, the agency suggests banks offer personalized, usage-based information to customers.
Some examples of fees examined in the report include those for account maintenance, excess transactions, the use of an ATM, non-sufficient funds and overdraft protection, currency conversion and cross-border debit, prepaid product payments and fees charged for customers to transfer-out funds to another bank.
Get weekly money news
The report says many of the fees can be combined, depending on the transaction or service, and consumers may not fully understand how those costs will add up before completing those transactions — even with current point-in-time disclosures.
Some of these fees and overall costs to consumers are avoidable or can be reduced in certain circumstances, but consumers may not be aware.
These include fees that add up when a customer exceeds their account limits, multiple fees on a single ATM withdrawal, when a fee on prepaid payments is withdrawn from that same prepaid payment and reduces its available balance over time, and when the cost of overdraft protection may cost less than a combination of fees for non-sufficient funds or dishonoured payments.
“Consumers may find it difficult to monitor their transaction usage throughout the billing cycle and to anticipate when excess transaction fees will be charged,” the report says.
“Banks are not required to notify consumers when they are approaching or have exceeded their transaction limits. As a result, consumers may only become aware that excess transaction fees have been charged after the end of the billing period.”
The report suggests changes be made to require that banks provide notifications when customers are nearing their transaction limits or may incur excess fees.
It adds: “Repeated reminders would increase the salience of these costs and may prompt consumers to reassess their account usage or consider alternative options that better align with their needs.”
Earlier this year, the federal government capped the fee banks can charge its customers for having non-sufficient funds, or NSFs, at $10.
Deciding which bank to go with can also be a challenge for consumers, the report says, noting that when consumers are deciding which bank’s fee structure aligns with their specific needs, many banks make comparing their products and services too complex.
For example, account holders may not be aware when the features they are entitled to no longer align with their needs, and when alternatives are available that are more helpful and cost effective.
Some banks have fees or processes that may also discourage consumers from switching accounts or banks. This includes transfer-out fees some banks charge customers to move money from one account to another.
The report says there are also barriers that make it difficult for consumers to compare products and services across institutions, including limited visibility into total banking costs over time.
“More transparency makes it easier for consumers to compare options and save money, and financial institutions have stronger incentives to compete for their business,” said Benzvy Miller, the watchdog’s commissioner.
The report from the Financial Consumer Agency of Canada comes amid an ongoing lawsuit and pending settlement that alleges CIBC unfairly charged non-sufficient funds fees to customers multiple times for the same transaction. A similar settlement involved TD Bank in 2024.
Canadians are drowning in all the fees and taxes they pay on nearly everything even groceries.
There are many other options to bank with no fees; Tangerine, EQ Bank, Simplii Financial, Wealthsimple, Neo, and a plethora of others. It’s about research and choices.
@Karl Marx. With respect, banking fees should be regulated because: 1)banks are an oligopoly which is not a perfectly competitive market; 2)banks profit off of deposits-they loan your money out via the interest rate differential; 3)Canada’s banks make huge profits relative to their international counterparts because of banking concentration in this country; 4)banks have a duty to lower and middle income people by virtue of their protected position. The government has a choice: either regulate these oligopolistic industries more, or encourage more competition.
Banks will not separate the income on what they make from just fees?? they no doubt do but probably too embarrassed to disclose it. FYI
TD Canada Trust holds the record for the highest fines in Canada and US. Banks, Insurance companies, lawyers, accountants, real estate agents all come from the same bowl of s_ _ _
Fees should be clearly shown, and customers should receive an on-screen notice if a fee is going to be charged for an action or service. If not, then maybe I should send a bill to my bank for my own services.
Ben
Why just banks
Loblaws don’t give free food Rogers doesn’t give you free service gas stations don’t give you free gas and so on They all are government regulated !
Why should banks give free service to anyone. If you don’t like the service keep your money under your mattress.
Banking fees should be regulated and banks should be forced to reimburse customers when they lose money in a scam. The banks are an oligopoly.
Banks like profit. The bigger profit the better.
Fees are good for Canadian banks
Higher bank stocks go it’s also good for your pension plans
Don’t complain and buy Canadian bank stocks
Carney promised lower bank fees in 2025. Another promise not kept.
Any excuse for implementing fees is a good excuse.
They keep our money, earn interest on our money and on top of it they charge fees for so called account maintenance.
And the best part… money you keep in the bank is not your money, it belongs to the bank actually. If something goes wrong… ooopppss, you’ll be lucky to get your $100,000 per family back if at all.
That’s the system!
Banking fees ‘is’ just fees, nothing more. You don’t like them, store your money elsewhere.
banking fees is just robbery, nothing more