Advertisement

Obama lobbying lawmakers on Syria from overseas

Watch: Obama continues to lobby for action on Syria while at G20 summit

WASHINGTON – President Barack Obama’s advisors were pressing Congress on Thursday, this time in closed-door meetings, for its authorization of a military strike on Syria, while the president arrived at a G-20 summit to certain questions and skepticism from other world leaders. That includes the event’s host, Russian President Vladimir Putin.

Putin, an ally of Syria and President Bashar Assad, is a reminder of resistance to U.S. pleas for Moscow to intervene after a deadly chemical weapons attack last month in the Damascus suburbs. The Obama administration says more than 1,400 people were killed. Other estimates are lower, and the Syrian government denies responsibility, saying opposition rebels were to blame.

Obama and Putin shared a 15-second greeting and may talk on the sidelines of the summit.

Watch: President Obama greeted by President Putin at G20

But frustration showed. At the United Nations, new U.S. Ambassador Samantha Power lashed into Russia, accusing it of holding the Security Council “hostage” by blocking action against its ally Syria. She spoke as Obama, Putin and other leaders were arriving for a working dinner.

Story continues below advertisement

Obama also was making calls to members of Congress while he attends the two-day economic summit, Ben Rhodes, the deputy national security adviser, told reporters.

Breaking news from Canada and around the world sent to your email, as it happens.

In Washington, the administration turned its attention to the opposition Republican-controlled House of Representatives after the Senate Foreign Relations Committee voted 10-7 Wednesday to authorize the “limited and specified use” of armed forces against Syria. It voted to support a resolution that restricts U.S. military action to 90 days and bars ground troops from combat.

The vote marked the first formal response in Congress, four days after Obama surprised the world by putting off an anticipated cruise missile strike against Syria and instead asked lawmakers to unite behind such a plan.

READ MORE: Senate panel votes to authorize force in Syria

The administration’s plan for military action in Syria needs approval from committees in both chambers and then approval from both full chambers to go ahead. The measure is expected to reach the Senate floor next week. The timing in the House is more uncertain.

But Obama on Wednesday, asked whether he would take action if he fails to get approval from Congress, told reporters in Sweden that as commander in chief, “I always preserve the right and the responsibility to act on behalf of America’s national security.”

Secretary of State John Kerry has said he believed Obama would address the nation on Syria in the next few days. The president returns home Friday night.

Story continues below advertisement

Few, if any, members of Congress dispute the Obama administration’s claim that Assad was responsible for the chemical weapons attack.

Watch: Minister of Foreign Affairs John Baird says he believes the evidence of chemical weapons use by the Assad government is “conclusive”

But many Republicans and Democrats in the House question why the U.S. should get involved now in a Syrian civil war that has killed an estimated 100,000, displaced millions and is in its third year. The chamber’s most powerful Republicans, House Speaker John Boehner and Majority Leader Eric Cantor, have expressed support for military action, but others in their party remain reluctant or opposed.

Days from a vote, an Associated Press survey of senators found 34 of its 100 members supporting or leaning toward military action, 26 opposed or leaning against and 40 undecided.

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: China warns G20 of global economic risks of Syria intervention

Sen. Dianne Feinstein, chairwoman of the Senate Intelligence Committee, acknowledged the lack of popular support for military intervention.

“It weighs on me,” she said. “There’s no question: What’s coming in is overwhelmingly negative.”

Sponsored content

AdChoices