While women face a ticking biological clock when it comes to fertility and healthy pregnancies, new research suggests men’s age is also a factor in predicting a couple’s chance of conceiving.
A new study out of Harvard Medical School and Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center suggests men’s age plays a role too, even if an older man is paired with a younger woman.
They say by age 40 to 42 fertility takes a hit, at least when it comes to IVF.
The findings build on the burgeoning field of paternal health. Before, the focus was set on mom’s well-being and her effect on baby’s health outcomes but now, the spotlight is on dads.
READ MORE: 7 fertility myths and misconceptions Canadian women need to know
It’s well known that women’s fertility takes a hit by around age 36 – 90 per cent of a woman’s eggs in her ovaries are depleted by age 30. After age 40, 97 per cent of her eggs are gone and the remaining eggs may not be as healthy, leaving women at risk of miscarriage or genetic abnormalities in their babies.
For Dodge’s study, she zeroed in on men. There are only a handful of studies pointing to a man’s age and its effect on naturally conceiving.
READ MORE: How bacon and sausages are changing your sperm quality
Dodge looked at 19,000 in vitro fertilization cycles performed at an IVF centre in Boston between 2000 and 2014.
The couples were categorized according to age: under 30, 30 to 35, 35 to 40, 40-42 and 42 and over (for men).
Dodge suggests her results “show quite clearly” that a man’s age is a predictor of efficacy of IVF. As age crept up in men, IVF success rates declined.
If a woman was under 30 and her partner was 4o to 42, there was a “significantly lower” birth rate of about 46 per cent compared to those who had partners who were between 30 and 35 (73 per cent).
READ MORE: How a father’s diet, lifestyle affect his baby’s healthy development
- Landmark smoking ban that would phase out sales passes U.K. parliament
- Budget 2024: Liberals look to offset drug plan cost with higher smoking, vaping taxes
- Health task force blasted over ‘dangerous guidance’ for cancer screenings
- Preventing future pandemics goal of new U.S. partnership with 50 countries
If a woman was 35 to 40, she fared better in getting pregnant and carrying a baby to term with a younger partner.
“Generally, we saw no significant decline in cumulative live birth when women had a male partner the same age or younger. However, women aged 35 to 40 did significantly benefit from having a male partner who is under age 30, in that they see a nearly 30 per cent relative improvement,” Dodge said.
Older age in men is also tied to fewer pregnancies, increased time to pregnancy and increased risk of miscarriage even in natural conceptions, Dodge said.
READ MORE: How fatherhood changes a man’s brain
It’s unclear why this is the case, but unhealthy semen, DNA damage in sperm or other alterations could be at play.
Across the board though, a woman’s age still has a “larger effect” on fertility while a man’s age is “subtle.”
Fifty to 60 per cent of women in their 20s and 30s who take on an infertility evaluation respond successfully to treatment, such as insemination, IVF or timed intercourse.
Fewer than one per cent of women conceive after age 45. By age 43, fertility treatment success rates are about five per cent despite great advances in IVF.
READ MORE: Here’s how much weight new dads gain after baby arrives
Dodge is presenting her findings Tuesday at the annual European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology meeting.
carmen.chai@globalnews.ca
Follow @Carmen_Chai
Comments