Advertisement

Federal lawyers tell top court existing voter ID laws are effective

A voter casts a ballot in the 2011 federal election in Toronto on May 2, 2011.
A voter casts a ballot in the 2011 federal election in Toronto on May 2, 2011. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Chris Young

OTTAWA – Federal government lawyers say a previous round of Conservative voter identification rules enacted in 2007 effectively met Parliament’s need for electoral integrity without being too strict.

The attorney general’s submission to the Supreme Court comes as the Harper government moves to further tighten voting restrictions under its controversial Fair Elections Act.

READ MORE: Electoral reform bill prompts ugly debate in Question Period

Breaking news from Canada and around the world sent to your email, as it happens.

It’s the second time the Conservatives have moved on what they perceive to be an issue of voter fraud, and it comes while their first round of reforms is still being legally contested.

Three British Columbia voters, with the help of the B.C. Civil Liberties Association, are seeking leave to appeal their constitutional challenge to the Supreme Court of Canada after twice losing in lower courts.

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: Mulcair lauds electoral reform amendments, wants to see details

Federal lawyers say the top court should not hear the case because it does not raise a matter of public importance.

The federal submission says the 2007 voter ID requirements – which included the failsafe of vouching – made what it called the “rare events” of fraud and voter error even more rare, while adding that the government’s latest voter ID restrictions under Bill C-23 should not be considered by the court because they could still be dropped or changed.

Sponsored content

AdChoices