Association of Municipalities of Ontario worries about housing bill impact

Click to play video: 'New housing bill would download affordable housing targets onto cities'
New housing bill would download affordable housing targets onto cities
WATCH ABOVE: On Tuesday, the Progressive Conservative government introduced legislation to freeze and reduce charges levied against developers in order to spur new home construction, including rentals and affordable housing. Colin D’Mello reports – Oct 25, 2022

TORONTO — Ontario municipalities are concerned that parts of the province’s new housing legislation may actually hamper growth and download excessive burdens to them and their taxpayers.

One aspect of a large bill introduced Tuesday by Municipal Affairs and Housing Minister Steve Clark would freeze, reduce and exempt fees developers pay in order to spur building.

Affordable housing, non-profit housing and inclusionary zoning units — meaning affordable housing in new developments — as well as some “attainable” units would be exempt from various charges.

But those fees go to municipalities to pay for services for residents of those homes, such as roads, community centres and transit.

The Association of Municipalities of Ontario said in a statement that the proposed changes “may contradict the goal of building more housing in the long term.”

Story continues below advertisement

“Unless fully offset by funding to support growth-related projects, reductions in these fees will shift the financial burden of growth-related infrastructure onto existing municipal taxpayers,” the association wrote.

Green party leader Mike Schreiner said the province needs to fund that lost revenue or it will be residents who have to foot the bill.

“If the province fails to step up to replace development charges they’re essentially calling for a tax increase on property taxpayers in this province,” he said after question period Wednesday.

“Municipalities are going to have to replace that revenue and really the only tool they have to replace it is to cut services or to raise property taxes.”

In response to a question from the NDP about it Wednesday, Clark said municipalities have $8 billion in development charge reserves.

“We’re going to continue to work with our municipal partners,” he said in question period. “We’re also going to work with the federal government on their $4-billion Housing Accelerator Fund. We think that would help municipalities as well.”

Toronto Mayor John Tory said the removal of those development charges could cost the city hundreds of millions of dollars.

Story continues below advertisement

“What we can’t afford to see happen is to see one government make promises and pay for it with somebody else’s money,” Tory said at a press conference.

“These charges we collect are not just charges that go into the general revenue stream. They are charges that are specifically allocated to things that need to get built under the principle of growth paying for growth.”

Tory said he is supportive of “the thrust” of what the legislation seeks to do but is “very concerned” about the development charges aspect.

“We are in a position where we want to spur housing,” he said.

“(New buildings) have to have sewers to take away the wastewater. They have to have water to supply those buildings. They have to have roads and transit to connect those buildings up to the rest of the city and those were and are paid for in part by development charges.”

The Ontario Big City Mayors group said it welcomed the bill but wants the public comment period on regulatory changes extended to enable further discussion.

“There are some very positive things in here, and there are some items that will require further review, such as the impact of removing development charges,” Cam Guthrie, mayor of Guelph, and chair of OBCM said in a statement.

Story continues below advertisement

“We look forward to further discussions with Minister Clark and his colleagues on these matters before legislation is passed.”

The government’s housing plan is aimed at hitting a target of building 1.5 million homes in 10 years. It also proposes to allow more units on one residential lot, introduce more housing density near transit stations, reduce the property tax burden for multi-residential apartment buildings, and pursue rent-to-own programs.

Sponsored content