U.S. retreat from U.N. Human Rights Council is ‘bad news’: council members

Click to play video: 'President of UN Human Rights Council reacts to U.S. withdrawal' President of UN Human Rights Council reacts to U.S. withdrawal
WATCH: The president of the UN Human Rights Council, Vojislav Suc, said on Wednesday that he acknowledged the "prerogative" of the U.S. to withdraw from the council but said the UN body needed to continue to defend the council's key role – Jun 20, 2018

China, Britain and the European Union lamented on Wednesday Washington’s decision to withdraw from the U.N. Human Rights Council as Western countries began looking for a substitute for the coveted seat.

The United States withdrew on Tuesday from what it called the “hypocritical and self-serving” forum over what it called chronic bias against its close ally Israel and a lack of reform after a year of negotiations.

READ MORE: U.S. pulls out of UN human rights council, calls it an organization ‘not worthy of its name’

Washington’s retreat – officially notified to the world body on Wednesday – is the latest U.S. rejection of multilateral engagement after it pulled out of the Paris climate agreement and the 2015 Iran nuclear deal. The U.S. delegation’s seat was empty and the nameplate removed at the end of the day.

“It is bad news, it is bad news for this council, it is bad news I think for the United Nations. It is bad news, I think for the United States, it is bad news for everybody who cares about human rights,” Slovenian President Borut Pahor told the 47-member forum in Geneva where the U.S. seat was empty.

Story continues below advertisement

WATCH: Nikki Haley announces U.S. withdrawal from UN Human Rights Council

Click to play video: 'Nikki Haley announces U.S. withdrawal from UN Human Rights Council' Nikki Haley announces U.S. withdrawal from UN Human Rights Council
Nikki Haley announces U.S. withdrawal from UN Human Rights Council – Jun 19, 2018

The European Union, Australia and Britain echoed his comments.

“We have lost a member who has been at the forefront of liberty for generations. While we agree with the U.S. on the need for reform, our support for this Human Rights Council remains steadfast, and we will continue to advance the cause of reform from within its ranks,” Britain’s ambassador Julian Braithwaite said.

WATCH: Trump-Kim summit: Human rights offences ‘briefly’ discussed in talks

Click to play video: 'Trump-Kim summit: Human rights offences ‘briefly’ discussed in talks' Trump-Kim summit: Human rights offences ‘briefly’ discussed in talks
Trump-Kim summit: Human rights offences ‘briefly’ discussed in talks – Jun 12, 2018

Bulgaria’s Ambassador Deyana Kostadinova, speaking on behalf of the EU, said the United States had been a “strong partner” at the talks. Its decision “risks undermining the role of the U.S. as a strong advocate and supporter of democracy on the world stage,” she added.

Story continues below advertisement

China’s foreign ministry expressed regret, with state media saying the image of the United States as a defender of rights was “on the verge of collapse.”

Diplomats have said the U.S. withdrawal could bolster Cuba, Russia, Egypt and Pakistan, which resist what they see as U.N. interference in sovereign issues.

READ MORE: Donald Trump dodges Kim Jong Un’s human rights record, says he’s ‘a smart guy’

The Tibet Advocacy Coalition, whose activists seek to raise attention to the situation in the autonomous region, said in a statement the U.S. decision “will allow China much more room to obfuscate and undermine the U.N. human rights system.”

Now the Trump administration has formally sent notification of its decision, the U.N. General Assembly will organize elections for a replacement to assume the U.S. term through 2019.

The Western group of countries in the council is expected to discuss the issue at their weekly meeting on Thursday, diplomats said.

READ MORE: Canada’s export laws must be strengthened to prevent human-rights violations: report

When the council was created in 2006, U.S. President George W. Bush’s administration shunned the body.

New Zealand, which stepped aside to allow the United States to win election to the Council in 2009 under President Barack Obama, may be a good choice as a replacement, two diplomats said. “There would be a certain symmetry,” one told Reuters.

Story continues below advertisement

Canada and the Netherlands were other possibilities, although no country has stepped forward yet, they said.

Sponsored content