Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.

TransCanada clashes with Keystone XL pipeline opponents at Nebraska hearing

FILE PHOTO: A depot used to store pipes for Transcanada Corp's planned Keystone XL oil pipeline is seen in Gascoyne, North Dakota, January 25, 2017. Reuters/ Terray Sylvester

Opponents of TransCanada Corporation’s proposed Keystone XL oil pipeline argued on Tuesday that regulators in Nebraska had no authority to approve the line’s “alternative” path through the state and that the project should be considered dead.

Story continues below advertisement

The Nebraska Public Service Commission issued an approval for the line to pass through the state in late November, removing what appeared to be the last big regulatory obstacle for the long-delayed project, which has been backed by U.S. President Donald Trump.

But the commission’s approval was not for the route TransCanada had singled out in its application, but for an alternative that shifts it closer to an existing pipeline right-of-way down the eastern side of the state.

David Domina, an attorney for landowners along the Keystone XL route, argued at a commission hearing on Tuesday that Nebraska law specifies the regulatory body can only rule on TransCanada’s preferred route.

“It uses the singular word ‘route.’ It doesn’t use the… plural term ‘routes,'” Domina said. “It’s not a smorgasbord statute.”

He said many landowners along the alternative path had not been notified a pipeline might be crossing their property, and that the specific social and environmental impacts of the alternative path had not been properly studied.

Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: TransCanada says it’s speaking with landowners along new Keystone XL route

Financial news and insights delivered to your email every Saturday.

Watch below: In November, an alternate route was approved for the Keystone XL pipeline project through Nebraska. It’s taken more than nine years and three tries to get here. Here’s a timeline.

Tuesday’s hearing was set after TransCanada filed a motion with the commission asking if it could amend its initial application, in a move to head off legal challenges.

Story continues below advertisement

By filing an amended application, “we are working to reduce the possibility of the PSC decision being overturned which would compromise our ability to build this project on time and on schedule,” a spokesman for the company told Reuters.

Pipeline opponents say that request should be denied because the Nebraska regulatory body’s statutes do not allow for retroactive amendments to such applications. The commission is considering TransCanada’s new application request.

While it is unclear how the commission will rule, the pipeline has strong political support stretching from the White House to the Nebraska governor’s mansion.

The proposed line, which would run about 1,899 kilometres from Hardisty, Alta., to Steele City, Neb., has been a lightning rod of controversy. Since it was proposed a decade ago, environmentalists have made it a symbol of their broader fight against fossil fuels and global warming. Business groups and Trump say it could lower fuel prices and create employment.

Trump handed TransCanada a federal permit for the pipeline in March as part of a broader agenda to boost the energy sector. That reversed a decision by former U.S. President Barack Obama in 2015 to block the project on grounds it would not bring significant enough economic benefits to outweigh its environmental impact.

Story continues below advertisement

-With files from Richard Valdmanis

Watch below: Some videos from Global News’ ongoing coverage of the Keystone XL pipeline.

 

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article