Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Comments closed.

Due to the sensitive and/or legal subject matter of some of the content on globalnews.ca, we reserve the ability to disable comments from time to time.

Please see our Commenting Policy for more.

Saskatoon murder trial may hinge on question of self-defence

WATCH ABOVE: The evidence and argument phase of an ongoing Saskatoon murder trial is now complete. At issue is if the accused acted in self-defence or not. Joel Senick reports. – Apr 5, 2017

A jury of seven men and five women will soon deliberate the fate of a Saskatoon man charged with second-degree murder.

Story continues below advertisement

Alvin Naistus, 26, is accused of stabbing William Johnston to death at the Northwoods Inn & Suites during the early morning hours of April 18, 2015.

READ MORE: Murder trial begins for Saskatoon man accused in motel parking lot stabbing

On Wednesday, the jury heard closing arguments from both lawyers in the case. The group is expected to begin deliberations on Thursday.

Naistus and Johnston were involved in an altercation outside of a hotel room prior to the stabbing, according to testimony. Both lawyers referred back to an eye-witness who said the men had bladed weapons in their hands and Johnston was the initial aggressor.

However, Crown prosecutor Jennifer Claxton-Viczko pointed to video evidence that shows Johnston backing up as Naistus came toward him. She argued that the video proves Naistus was not acting in self-defence.

“There’s nothing stopping [Naistus] from walking away,” Claxton-Viczko said during her final argument.
Story continues below advertisement

READ MORE: Homicide investigation finds Saskatoon woman forced to defend herself

However, defence lawyer Patrick McDougall contended that if Naistus had turned to walk away from Johnston, he would have been the one stabbed to death instead. McDougall told the jury that if someone is being attacked, they have the right to defend themselves and stop the attack from happening.

“Alvin Naistus was trying to survive, he wasn’t trying to kill William Johnston,” McDougall said during his closing argument.

McDougall also described the video evidence as “suspect” since it’s hard to make out much of the footage. He added that if the jury does not conclude Naistus acted in self-defence, they should still find him not guilty of second-degree murder.

“At best it’s manslaughter,” McDougall said.

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article