Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.

Provincial transit funding shortfall ‘sideswipes’ infrastructure agenda: Edmonton mayor

WATCH ABOVE: Mayor Don Iveson says the province is taking a frustrating step backwards when it comes to infrastructure funding. The city is getting $23-million less than it expected from the government for transit projects. Tom Vernon has the details. – Aug 19, 2016

The province is contributing $23 million less for public transit than the City of Edmonton expected, but the Alberta government says the city made an assumption and an exact amount wasn’t promised.

Story continues below advertisement

Alberta will cover 25 per cent of Phase 1 of transit projects funding, instead of the one-third share the city was banking on.

“The future of transit funding in this country can’t be the feds stepping up and the provinces stepping back,” Edmonton Mayor Don Iveson said.

“The future of transit funding in this country has to recognize, as the federal government has – and we applaud them for it – that municipalities, with maybe eight cents of your tax dollar, take on 100 per cent of the operating and maintenance costs for these systems, which are enormous and that the old formula – of a third, a third, a third – just was too much of a burden on municipalities.”

Phase 1 includes about $3.4 billion over the next couple of years for transit projects, the mayor explained. Phase 2, he said, is a larger $16.5 billion over 10 years.

READ MORE: Provinces to receive new infrastructure funding under Liberal plan 

Iveson said the city will be able to find a way to make up for the shortfall, but some maintenance projects will have to be deferred.

Story continues below advertisement

“It just sort of sideswipes our infrastructure agenda and our attempt to look after all our assets in a state of good repair.”

Financial news and insights delivered to your email every Saturday.

READ MORE: Cities seek more power as service demands rise

The mayor said, given the late nature of the federal government’s funding commitment, provinces might be struggling to match the contribution, especially if – like Alberta – they’re in a tough economic state.

However, Alberta’s minister of infrastructure and transportation says the city jumped the gun on what the provincial amount would be.

“The city made an assumption that it would be 33 per cent, that they would get a 17 per cent-share in the projects, but I don’t think that was a justified assumption,” Brian Mason said.

He said he’s “very pleased” by the provincial support, calling it “very generous.”

“The federal government has really stepped up with a great infrastructure program and we’re pleased to match 25 per cent of the total project cost,” Mason said.

Story continues below advertisement

In an email sent in June, the province told the city it was still figuring out how the final 50 per cent of the funding would be broken down.

READ MORE: Alberta Budget 2016: NDP spends $7B on roads, hoping to boost economy, jobs

“Other cities, including Calgary, assumed no provincial contribution, so I think it’s interesting that the City of Edmonton assumed we’d pick up a third of the cost of these projects without hearing from us first,” Mason said.

The minister said, in more prosperous times, the support might be greater.

“If we were at a point where we had $100/barrel oil again, we could afford to perhaps be more generous, but we have a very serious financial situation facing the province of Alberta, a very large deficit.”

Iveson said he wasn’t completely surprised by the province’s decision, but called it a “frustrating step backwards.”

Story continues below advertisement

He is worried about how this move will affect future projects.

“My concern would be is if 50-25-25 ends up being the percentage breakdown – federal, provincial, municipal, for the $16.5 billion that’s coming over the next 10 years to actually build LRT and heavy transit across the country, then that’s just not going to work.

“I can tell you 50-25-25 would be unacceptable for Phase 2. It’s tolerable for Phase 1.”

*EDITOR’S NOTE: This article initially described the one-third contribution from the province as “traditional.” It was later changed to say “the one-third share the city was banking on.”

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article