Richard Henry Bain trial: Crown, defence psychiatrists disagree on his mental state

The forensic psychiatrists for the Crown and defence disagree on the mental state of Richard Henry Bain, charged with first-degree murder after allegedly opening fire on Quebec election night in September 2012.

READ MORE: Mixing meds made alleged Quebec election shooter a ticking time bomb, says expert

Defence expert Marie-Frédérique Allard was asked Monday in court to comment on Crown expert Joel Watts’ claim that Bain was not delusional and psychotic the night he allegedly started shooting outside the Parti Québécois (PQ) election headquarters.

READ MORE: Psychiatrist who assessed Bain says he was ‘likely’ psychotic night of shooting

Allard said she disagrees and maintains Bain’s use of anti-depressants and an underlying bipolar disorder triggered a manic and psychotic episode.

READ MORE: Richard Henry Bain claims anti-depressants fuelled actions during election-night shooting

Bain, 65, has pleaded not guilty to one count of first-degree murder, three counts of attempted murder and two arson-related charges in connection with the shooting outside the Metropolis nightclub in Montreal where PQ supporters were gathered.

The accused’s lawyers are arguing Bain is not criminally responsible for the crimes because of a mental disorder while the Crown contends Bain acted out of anger.

READ MORE: Accused speaks out about depression, not knowing right from wrong

Crown prosecutor Dennis Galiatsatos is expected to begin his cross-examination of Allard later on in the day, with Watts to follow for the prosecution.