Menu

Topics

Connect

Comments

Comments closed.

Due to the sensitive and/or legal subject matter of some of the content on globalnews.ca, we reserve the ability to disable comments from time to time.

Please see our Commenting Policy for more.

Former Falkland RCMP officer’s civil suit alleging internal investigation mishandled goes to trial

WATCH: The first police officer to arrive at the scene of an infamous North Okanagan murder took the stand in a civil trial on Monday. In 2011, Milan Ilic was among the first to find 18-year-old Tayor Van Diest beaten and strangled. He later found himself under internal investigation over allegations about his conduct that night. Now the former Mountie is taking the government to court alleging that the internal investigation was mishandled, seriously damaging his mental health – Apr 4, 2022

Former Falkland RCMP officer Milan Ilic took the stand on Monday in Kamloops, B.C., as the civil lawsuit he launched against the federal and provincial governments, nearly six years ago, finally went to trial.

Story continues below advertisement

Forty-three-year-old Ilic, who was medically discharged from the force in 2019, is alleging the RCMP mishandled an internal investigation into allegations against him resulting in serious damage to Ilic’s mental health.

On Monday, Ilic and his lawyer began to lay out the plaintiff’s version of events.

In 2011, Ilic was among the first to find 18-year-old Tayor Van Diest beaten and strangled near railroad tracks in Armstrong, B.C.

The teen would later die from her injuries and at the resulting murder trial, an allegation surfaced that Ilic had thrown a bottle of liquor out of his pocket at the scene.

Ilic said originally, and repeated on the stand Monday, that he had nothing to do with a liquor bottle found in the area, and what he had tossed that night was a box of pens.

Story continues below advertisement

Ilic described tossing the pens so he could use his jacket to cover the injured teen and try to keep her warm.

However, in March 2014, after he testified at the murder trial, Ilic was questioned by two senior officers about the liquor bottle, which left him gutted.

The daily email you need for Okanagan's top news stories.

“I told them the truth and they came after my integrity,” Ilic said.

Ilic testified that he wondered at the time if he was getting the blame for the police not having done more testing on the bottle during the murder investigation.

Ilic’s lawyer is also taking issue with the way the interview by senior officers was conducted.

Story continues below advertisement

Ilic was allegedly not given the appropriate warnings or provided with the opportunity to consult with a staff representative.

In court documents, the defendants say Ilic was not under investigation at that point so no warning was needed and he never asked to talk to a staff rep.

Ultimately, Ilic’s denials about the liquor bottle lead to allegations that he had lied on the stand and to senior officers and a police code of conduct investigation was launched.

Ilic argues that the way the whole process was handled ended up seriously harming his mental health.

“While the RCMP are entitled to a code of conduct investigation, such investigation must be conducted in an objective, bonafide and expedient basis. The RCMP owe a duty of care to anyone they investigate let alone a member being investigated internally,” Ilic’s lawyer said.

Story continues below advertisement
“The process endured by Const. Ilic… [was] rife with violations of and breaches of the RCMP administrative manuals and core values of the RCMP, which caused a serious and foreseeable decline in his mental health.”

The provincial and federal governments maintain RCMP members acted properly.

The civil trial is expected to last for weeks and include testimony from Taylor Van Diest’s mother and other RCMP officers.

While the lawsuit originally named both the federal and provincial governments, Ilic’s lawyer said on Monday that they were discontinuing the claim against the federal government as Ilic is receiving a Veteran Affairs pension and is therefore barred from maintaining a claim against the federal government.

Advertisement

You are viewing an Accelerated Mobile Webpage.

View Original Article