June 25, 2019 9:32 pm

Federal judge rules allowing Democrats’ lawsuit against Trump to proceed

President Donald Trump listens to a question during a meeting with Canadian Prime Minister Justin Trudeau in the Oval Office of the White House, Thursday, June 20, 2019, in Washington.

(AP Photo/Evan Vucci)
A A

A federal judge ruled Tuesday that a lawsuit that accuses U.S. President Donald Trump of profiting off the presidency in violation of the Constitution’s emoluments clause can move forward.

U.S. District Judge Emmett G. Sullivan of the District of Columbia ruled against Justice Department lawyers who sought a mid-case appeal to a higher court and a stay on proceedings.

READ MORE: White House won’t allow Kellyanne Conway to testify on alleged federal law violations

The case brought by nearly 200 congressional Democrats argues that Trump has been accepting gifts from foreign governments without congressional approval. Trump, unlike modern presidents before him, has declined to fully divest from his businesses.

The lawmakers say Trump’s unwillingness to ask permission is akin to denying lawmakers the right to do their jobs.

WATCH: U.S. House approves authority to sue Trump advisers who ignore subpoenas


Story continues below

The judge’s decision clears the way for the lawmakers to begin subpoenas for information.

Tuesday’s ruling came as Trump was heading to a roundtable event and fundraiser with supporters at his namesake hotel in Washington.

House Speaker Nancy Pelosi welcomed the ruling. As the Trump administration largely stonewalls congressional investigations, House Democrats have increasingly turned to the courts for relief. It’s the latest of several recent court rulings in their favour.

READ MORE: Trump’s appeal has put subpoenas for his financial records on hold: court filing

“No one is above the law – not even the president,” Pelosi said in a statement. “Once again, the courts have resoundingly reaffirmed our efforts to hold the President accountable for corruption, and ensure that the President acts in the public interest, not his own interest.”

One of the lead lawmakers in the suit, Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., tweeted, “This tremendous victory assures that President Trump will be held accountable to the Constitution & the American people _ a historic triumph for legally mandated transparency.”

The case argues that the president has received foreign government favours, such as Chinese government trademarks for his companies, payments for hotel room stays and event-space rentals by representatives of Saudi Arabia and Kuwait, and proceeds from Chinese or Emirati-linked government purchases of office space in Trump Tower.

WATCH: Trump comments on judge ruling against lawsuit challenging subpoena for financial records

Ethics experts say the constitutional emoluments clause was created by the Founding Fathers to ensure that government officials act with the interests of the American public in mind instead of their own pocketbooks.

READ MORE: Donald Trump on E. Jean Carroll sexual assault allegation: ‘She’s not my type’

Unlike prior presidents, Trump chose not to divest from his assets and he remains the owner of the Trump Organization, a sprawling business empire with 550 entities in more than 20 countries that include branded hotels, golf courses, licensing deals and other interests. His Washington, D.C., hotel is near the White House and has become a magnet for foreign governments, previously hosting groups tied to Kuwait, Bahrain, Turkey, Malaysia and Saudi Arabia.

© 2019 The Canadian Press

Report an error

Comments

Want to discuss? Please read our Commenting Policy first.