Advertisement

Sheriff should have to defend anti-protest laws believed to be aimed at Keystone XL pipeline opponents: lawyer

WATCH ABOVE: Some videos from Global News' coverage of the Keystone XL pipeline.

Attorneys for oil pipeline opponents are fighting a South Dakota sheriff’s attempt to be dismissed as a defendant in a lawsuit challenging new state laws that aim to prevent disruptive demonstrations against the Keystone XL pipeline.

Pennington County Sheriff Kevin Thom should remain a defendant in the suit spearheaded by the American Civil Liberties Union because he will be enforcing law that amounts to an unconstitutional infringement on free speech, an attorney for the plaintiffs argued in a Tuesday court filing.

The Republican-backed legislation passed in March allows officials to pursue criminal or civil penalties from demonstrators who engage in “riot boosting,” which is defined in part as encouraging violence during a riot.

READ MORE: South Dakota governor, Oglala Sioux in pipeline protest law standoff

Supporters of the legislation sought to head off protests of the Keystone XL like those mounted against the Dakota Access oil pipeline in North Dakota in 2016 and 2017. North Dakota spent $38 million USD on policing those protests, which resulted in 761 arrests over a six-month span.

Story continues below advertisement

Watch above: Some videos about opposition to the Dakota Access pipeline.

The ACLU is suing South Dakota Gov. Kristi Noem, Attorney General Jason Ravnsborg and Thom in federal court on behalf of activists. An attorney for Thom last month asked that the sheriff be dismissed from the lawsuit, saying he must enforce state laws but isn’t responsible for defending them. Attorney Rebeca L. Mann also argued that Pennington County shouldn’t have to defend state laws that it doesn’t have the power to change.

Breaking news from Canada and around the world sent to your email, as it happens.

Plaintiffs’ attorney Brendan Johnson countered in Tuesday’s court filing that “each time Thom makes a choice about the laws’ meaning, as the highest official in the county for that action, he is doing so as a policymaker for Pennington County.”

Johnson also argued that Thom must use his own discretion when enforcing the law, making him an “appropriate defendant.”

Story continues below advertisement

Pennington County is one of eight South Dakota counties along the route of TC Energy’s planned Keystone XL pipeline to move Canadian crude through Montana and South Dakota to Nebraska, where it would connect with lines to Gulf Coast refineries. The $8 billion USD project has the backing of U.S. President Donald Trump but is being fought in the courts by opponents.

READ MORE: U.S. says it will complete environmental review for Keystone XL pipeline

The ACLU of South Dakota, North Dakota and Wyoming said it named Thom as a defendant in the lawsuit because he’s sheriff in the county in which the activists are working. Plaintiffs include the Rapid City-based NDN Collective non-profit, which advocates for indigenous peoples and climate change awareness.

Sponsored content

AdChoices