Advertisement

Trumpcare vote delayed as Senate Republicans rebel against GOP bill

Click to play video: 'Sen. McConnell calls meeting with Trump on health reform bill ‘very helpful’'
Sen. McConnell calls meeting with Trump on health reform bill ‘very helpful’
WATCH ABOVE: Sen. Mitch McConnell spoke to the media after a meeting with President Trump on the stalled health reform bill and called the session "very helpful." – Jun 27, 2017

In a bruising setback, Senate Republican leaders shelved a vote on their prized health care bill Tuesday until at least next month, forced to retreat by a GOP rebellion that left them lacking enough votes to even begin debate.

“We will not be on the bill this week,” Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., told reporters in what was a remarkable reversal of plans to push one of President Donald Trump’s and the GOP’s top priorities through the chamber this week.

“But we’re still working toward getting at least 50 people in a comfortable place,” he said. That’s the number of GOP senators who must back the bill for it to survive, with all Democrats opposed.

“We’re got a lot of discussions going on, and I’m still optimistic we’re going to get there,” he added.

Story continues below advertisement

Minutes earlier, McConnell divulged the decision to GOP senators at a private lunch also attended by Vice-President Mike Pence and White House chief of staff Reince Priebus.

WATCH: Mitch McConnell announced Tuesday that the controversial “Trumpcare” Republican healthcare bill will not be voted on 
Click to play video: 'Vote on ‘Trumpcare’ bill delayed, will not happen before 4th of July'
Vote on ‘Trumpcare’ bill delayed, will not happen before 4th of July

GOP senators planned to travel to the White House later Tuesday to meet with Trump.

McConnell had hoped to push the measure through his chamber before an Independence Day recess that party leaders fear will be used by foes of the legislation to tear away support.

Financial news and insights delivered to your email every Saturday.

The bill, which would roll back much of President Barack Obama’s health care law, has been one of the party’s top priorities for years, and the delay is a major embarrassment to Trump and McConnell. At least five GOP senators – conservatives and moderates – have said they would vote against even beginning debate, and the bill would be derailed if just three of the 52 Republican senators voted against it.

Story continues below advertisement

GOP defections increased after Congress’ budget referee said Monday the measure would leave 22 million more people uninsured by 2026 than Obama’s 2010 statute.

WATCH: Democratic Senator says fight against Trumpcare isn’t over 

Click to play video: 'Chuck Shumer on Trumpcare delay: We know the fight isn’t over'
Chuck Shumer on Trumpcare delay: We know the fight isn’t over

Utah’s Mike Lee became the fifth Republican senator to oppose letting the chamber formally begin considering the proposal.

Lee was among four conservatives who announced last week that they were against the current version of the legislation.

Still, House Speaker Paul Ryan, R-Wis., told reporters,

The Congressional Budget Office analysis suggested some ammunition GOP leaders could use, saying the Senate bill would cut federal deficits by $202 billion more over the coming decade than the version the House approved in May. Senate leaders could use some of those additional savings to attract moderate votes by making Medicaid and other provisions more generous, though conservatives would rather use that money to reduce government red ink.

Story continues below advertisement

Minutes after the CBO report’s release, three GOP senators threatened to oppose beginning debate. Moderate Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine, said she would vote no. She tweeted that she favours a bipartisan effort to fix Obama’s statute but added, “CBO analysis shows Senate bill won’t do it.”

Conservative Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., said he would oppose the motion to open debate unless the bill was changed.

And fellow conservative Ron Johnson, R-Wis., said he had “a hard time believing” he’d have enough information to back that motion this week. Moderate Sen. Dean Heller, R-Nev., said Friday he’d oppose the procedural motion without alterations.

READ MORE: Latest version of Trumpcare still leaves 22 million Americans without insurance: report

Lee and other conservatives have favoured a fuller repeal of Obama’s statute than the Senate bill would enact.

The 22 million extra uninsured Americans were just 1 million fewer than the number the budget office estimated would become uninsured under the House version. Trump has called the House bill “mean” and prodded senators to produce a package with more “heart.”

The budget office report said the Senate bill’s coverage losses would especially affect people between ages 50 and 64, before they qualify for Medicare, and with incomes below 200 per cent of the poverty level, or around $30,300 for an individual.

Story continues below advertisement

The Senate plan would end the tax penalty the law imposes on people who don’t buy insurance, in effect erasing Obama’s so-called individual mandate, and on larger businesses that don’t offer coverage to workers.

It would let states ease Obama’s requirements that insurers cover certain specified services like substance abuse treatments. It also would eliminate $700 billion worth of taxes over a decade, largely on wealthier people and medical companies – money that Obama’s law used to expand coverage.

It would cut Medicaid, which provides health insurance to over 70 million poor and disabled people, by $772 billion through 2026 by capping its overall spending and phasing out Obama’s expansion of the program. Of the 22 million people losing health coverage, 15 million would be Medicaid recipients.

CBO said that average premiums around the country would be higher over the next two years – including about 20 per cent higher in 2018 than under Obama’s statute – but lower beginning in 2020.

The office said that overall, the Senate legislation would increase consumers’ out of pocket costs. That’s because standard policies would be skimpier than currently offered under Obama’s law, covering a smaller share of expected medical costs.

Sponsored content

AdChoices