Man convicted of plotting to derail Via train removed from Toronto courtroom

In an artist's sketch, Chiheb Esseghaier (left) and Raed Jaser (centre) appear in court in Toronto on Thursday, March 5, 2015 as Justice Michael Code looks on.
In an artist's sketch, Chiheb Esseghaier (left) and Raed Jaser (centre) appear in court in Toronto on Thursday, March 5, 2015 as Justice Michael Code looks on. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Alexandra Newbould

TORONTO — A man convicted of plotting to derail a passenger train was removed from court Tuesday after he lay down in the prisoner dock to protest the “lies” of a psychiatrist who testified the man was schizophrenic.

Dr. Lisa Ramshaw also told a sentencing hearing that Chiheb Esseghaier’s delusional thoughts have developed over time, including his psychotic beliefs about the trial and his role in the court.

“He has indicated that he is not actually here as a criminal but as a visitor of the court to disseminate the information about the true ways of Islam.”

READ MORE: Sentencing hearing continues in Via Rail terror case in Toronto

Esseghaier took exception to the doctor’s testimony.

“Mr. Esseghaier, I just noticed you’re lying down in the prisoners dock,” Justice Michael Code said during Ramshaw’s testimony.

Story continues below advertisement

Esseghaier got increasingly angry and stood up.

“She is lying,” he said, adding that he was lying down because he didn’t want to “listen to the lies of this woman.”

“You’re not present if you’re lying down and sleeping. That is not presence in Canadian law,” Code replied before having him removed.

Code ordered the psychiatric assessment in May after Esseghaier told the court he had been created by God to “warn mankind” about “hellfire” if the messages of the Qur’an weren’t followed.

READ MORE: Man found guilty in Via Rail plot motivated by drug addiction, court hears

Esseghaier and his co-accused Raed Jaser were found guilty in March of a terror-related conspiracy to commit murder, which carries a sentence of up to life in prison.

A 12-member jury also found the men guilty of six other terror-related charges between them.

Earlier in the day, Crown attorney Croft Michaelson challenged the credibility of a psychologist who testified that Jaser was motivated by a severe drug addiction, not Islamic ideology.

Dr. Jess Ghannam, a licensed psychologist and clinical professor of psychiatry at the University of California, San Francisco, testified Monday that Jaser adopted a persona as a pious Muslim to con members of that community to feed his addiction.

Story continues below advertisement

Ghannam, who conducted an assessment of Jaser, concluded that the permanent resident of Palestinian descent did not have consistent radical Islamic ideology and had no intention to hurt anyone.

Michaelson questioned Ghannam’s objectivity in the case, accusing him of massaging facts because they did not fit the theory he was trying to put forward.

READ MORE: Mental health of man convicted in Via train terror plot ‘real issue’: lawyer

“You misrepresented the information you were told,” Michaelson said about interviews the psychologist conducted with Jaser and several members of his family.

“You already concluded when you were preparing this report that Jaser was a drug addict.”

Michaelson also accused Ghannam of disregarding diagnostic tests that showed Jaser had a low level of psychological distress.

Ghannam countered that the diagnostic tests were “one aspect” of his assessment.

“Probably the most compelling aspect of that was the clinical interview,” he said.

During Jaser and Esseghaier’s trial, court heard that an undercover FBI agent gained the men’s trust and surreptitiously recorded their conversations, which made up the bulk of the evidence in the case.

The two were recorded speaking about alleged terror plots they would conduct in retaliation for Canada’s military actions in Muslim countries, including the derailment of a Via Rail train travelling between New York and Toronto.

Story continues below advertisement

In one of the recordings, Jaser was heard saying “everyone is a target” and that he wanted “the whole country to burn.”

Esseghaier refused to participate in his trial because he wanted to be judged under the rules of the Qur’an.

Jaser’s defence lawyer argued his client was only faking interest in a terror plot as part of an elaborate con to extract money from Esseghaier and the undercover agent.