Advertisement

Toronto Pearson airport security clearance revoked over dad being in biker gang

Aircraft are pictured at the gates at Toronto Pearson Airport. Mark Del Vecchio had been working as a mechanic since 1992 and owns an aviation maintenance business operating out of Pearson. Fred Lum / File / The Globe and Mail

TORONTO – A Federal Court judge has ruled that the government was right to revoke an aircraft mechanic’s security clearance because his father was a member of a motorcycle gang.

The ruling found that Mark Del Vecchio, who previously had clearance to work out of Toronto’s Pearson International Airport, represented a potential safety risk in part due to his association with his father.

The July 18 decision from Justice Glennys McVeigh upheld a prior decision from the Minister of Transport, who has the power to grant or revoke security clearance for those with access to sensitive airport areas.

McVeigh agreed with the reasoning that Del Vecchio’s clearance was revoked on a number of grounds including association with his father, who is described in the decision as a full-patch member of the Vagabonds motorcycle gang.

Story continues below advertisement

The decision says other factors included Del Vecchio’s failure to disclose an alleged domestic incident and inconsistent disclosure of an impaired driving conviction.

McVeigh’s ruling, however, places most emphasis on the relationship with Del Vecchio’s father.

“Mr. Del Vecchio’s association with his father alone is grounds for cancelling his security clearance,” she wrote in her decision.

Breaking news from Canada and around the world sent to your email, as it happens.

The decision said Del Vecchio had been working as a mechanic since 1992 and owns an aviation maintenance business operating out of Pearson.

As part of the job, Del Vecchio was required to have security clearance to work at the airport. The decision said he had successfully applied for and been granted clearance several times over the years.

He first encountered hurdles when he tried to renew his clearance in 2009.

At that time, the decision states, the government became aware of a 1993 conviction for care and control of a vehicle while impaired and a 2007 charge of possession of property obtained by crime.

Del Vecchio submitted documents that satisfied the ministry and his clearance was renewed until 2014, the decision states. There are no details as to the outcome of the 2007 charge.

Story continues below advertisement

Del Vecchio successfully reapplied for clearance in 2014, but came to the government’s attention a year later as a result of a record check by the RCMP.

That check turned up the previous impaired driving conviction, an alleged domestic incident in 2007, and the fact that a vehicle registered to Del Vecchio had been seen parked outside the home of a full-patch Vagabonds member, the decision says.

Del Vecchio had an opportunity to respond to the findings of the record check and submitted documents on the issue, but his clearance was formally revoked in July 2016.

He contested the decision on a number of grounds, including the fact that he had disclosed the impaired driving conviction on a previous application and sincerely believed he did not have to do so again.

He also argued that his father’s activities should not have any bearing on his status, since he himself is not a member of the gang and mere association should not be grounds to have clearance revoked.

McVeigh disagreed.

“The Minister does not need to demonstrate that acts of intimidation or threats will happen, rather that they may happen,” she wrote of Del Vecchio’s potential ties to organized crime.

Story continues below advertisement

“The reason for this standard is due to the forward looking and inherently speculative nature of predicting future risk. This is entirely discretionary and when weighing a security clearance privilege against public safety, the Minister is entitled to err on the side of safety.”

McVeigh ruled in favour of the ministry and Del Vecchio’s clearance remains revoked.

His lawyer, Harry Mann, did not immediately respond to request for comment.

Sponsored content

AdChoices