Accusations of criminality were hurled at the ridesharing service Uber during tense exchanges between the public and city officials on Thursday.
The company was called out during a regular meeting of the Municipal Licensing and Standards Committee for operating outside existing bylaws and bullying its agenda into city hall, according to one councillor.
The debate revolved around new proposed regulations for “vehicle-for-hire” companies, which include Uber.
READ MORE: Toronto’s proposed Uber bylaw panned by taxi industry
So many people registered to speak that the meeting had to be moved to council chambers to accommodate the audience.
Many were unhappy with what they see as the city’s move to let the company self-regulate.
“I think what has happened here is a complete capitulation to Uber, ” said Councillor Janet Davis.
“They have demonstrated once again that they will plow forward into a market with a bullish arrogance.”
Many on council, however, support Uber’s entrance into the transportation landscape.
“The consumers have spoken loud and clear that they like this service,” said Councillor John Campbell.
“I wouldn’t say it’s our job as a city to ensure the long-term security of any industry.”
Many taxi driver worry allowing Uber to operate under favourable conditions would cripple their industry.
Sympathetic politicians introduced amendments to strip away many of the provisions they feel unfairly affect the taxi industry.
“I’m looking to make sure we have a level playing field,” said Councillor Jim Karygiannis. “This means you have cameras in the cars and snow tires, and no surge pricing.”
READ MORE: New Uber PR campaign to sway city hall could backfire, expert warns
Karygiannis’ amendment also proposes to increase the licensing fee for vehicles-for-hire to $500 from $290.
But some of the most ardent supporters of Uber were members living with a disability. They say it affords them greater flexibility and dignity knowing that a vehicle will arrive in a timely manner and able to accommodate their needs.
Shafiul Hoque is both a driver and user of the service who has a hearing disability.
READ MORE: Taxis aren’t our main competition, drivers are: Uber legal director
“The flexibility really appeals to the deaf community,” he said. “I really like it because I can’t communicate by phone a lot of the times.”
Being an Uber driver-partner also allows him to earn an income.
“I love the job and am able to support my family,” Hoque said.
“For 10 years I haven’t been able to find a job, and Uber has offered me that opportunity.”
From here, the amended regulations will go before city council on May 3 and 4 where the final vote will take place.
Read the full bylaw proposal here:
Comments